IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v26y2019i3p246-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From manstream measuring to multispecies sustainability? A gendered reading of bee‐ing sustainable

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia Davies
  • Kathleen Riach

Abstract

This article draws on an ethnography of bee‐work to explore how androcentrism is enacted and disrupted in environmental organizing practices. We first situate the study in recent debates surrounding sustainability, viewing this as one organizing project that informs the recent ‘Save the Bees’ discourse and initiatives proliferating the global North. Theoretically inspired by ideas from political ecology and feminist materialism, we suggest that dominant ‘bee‐saving’ practices are enacted through masculinist conceptions of ‘manstream’ measuring. Focusing on biosecurity inspections during one significant pollination event, we draw on three motifs to explore both the enactment and disruption of sanitized, linear and falsely bounded distinctions that often re/produce practices which have outcomes counter to their intended objectives. Reflecting on three field‐based moments — Pests, Protection and Pace — we consider the possibilities for an alternative modality of multispecies sustainability that is inspired by a new materialism agenda. This not only serves to dismantle inherent binaries through paying attention to the ontological muddling of species, but also helps to consider the productive relations that may emerge when we depart from masculinist modes of sustainable thinking in organizational and institutional settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia Davies & Kathleen Riach, 2019. "From manstream measuring to multispecies sustainability? A gendered reading of bee‐ing sustainable," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 246-266, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:246-266
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12245
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anu Valtonen, 2020. "Diversity, affect and embodiment in organizing Marianna Fotaki and Alison Pullen (Eds.) Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1508-1510, November.
    2. Charles Barthold & David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec, 2022. "An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1796-1814, November.
    3. Anu Valtonen & Alison Pullen, 2021. "Writing with rocks," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 506-522, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:246-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.