IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eufman/v11y2005i5p625-647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Companies Influence Investor Behaviour through Advertising? Super Bowl Commercials and Stock Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Fehle
  • Sergey Tsyplakov
  • Vladimir Zdorovtsov

Abstract

"Recent research shows that mood and attention may affect investors' choices. In this paper we examine whether companies can create such mood and attention effects through advertising. We choose a natural experiment by investigating price reactions and trading activity for firms employing TV commercials in 19 Super Bowl broadcasts over the 1969-2001 period. We find significant positive abnormal returns for firms which are readily identifiable from the ad contents, which is consistent with the presence of mood and attention effects. For recognisable companies with the number of ads greater than the sample mean, the event is followed by an average abnormal one day return of 45 basis points. The effect appears to persist in the short term with the 20-day post-event cumulative abnormal returns for such firms averaging 2%. We find significant abnormal net buying activity for small trades in shares of recognised Super Bowl advertisers indicating that small investors tend to be the ones most attracted by the increased publicity". Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Fehle & Sergey Tsyplakov & Vladimir Zdorovtsov, 2005. "Can Companies Influence Investor Behaviour through Advertising? Super Bowl Commercials and Stock Returns," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 11(5), pages 625-647.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eufman:v:11:y:2005:i:5:p:625-647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00301.x
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malmendier, Ulrike M. & Shanthikumar, Devin, 2004. "Are Investors Naive about Incentives?," Research Papers 1867, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aspara, Jaakko & Chakravarti, Amitav, 2015. "Investors’ reactions to company advertisements: the persuasive effect of product-featuring ads," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64130, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Fumiko Takeda & Hiroaki Yamazaki, 2006. "Stock Price Reactions to Public TV Programs on Listed Japanese Companies," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 13(7), pages 1-7.
    3. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:13:y:2006:i:7:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Takeda, Fumiko & Wakao, Takumi, 2014. "Google search intensity and its relationship with returns and trading volume of Japanese stocks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Kaniel, Ron & Ozoguz, Arzu & Starks, Laura, 2012. "The high volume return premium: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 255-279.
    6. Jeffery Born & Yousra Acherqui, 2015. "A symmetric Super Bowl stock market predictor model," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 29(2), pages 115-124, May.
    7. repec:eee:pacfin:v:46:y:2017:i:pb:p:243-257 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Carretta, Alessandro & Farina, Vincenzo & Graziano, Elvira Anna & Reale, Marco, 2011. "Does investor attention influence stock market activity? The case of spin-off deals," MPRA Paper 33545, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Raithel, Sascha & Taylor, Charles R. & Hock, Stefan J., 2016. "Are Super Bowl ads a super waste of money? Examining the intermediary roles of customer-based brand equity and customer equity effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3788-3794.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eufman:v:11:y:2005:i:5:p:625-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/efmaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.