IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v79y2003i245p245-258b.html

Enterprise Bargaining and Productivity in Australia: What do We Know?

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne Loundes
  • Yi‐Ping Tseng
  • Mark Wooden

Abstract

There appears to be widespread consensus, at least in industry and government, that enterprise bargaining has been beneficial for productivity. Many academics, however, have argued that the link between bargaining structure and workplace productivity is a contentious one, and that research has been unable to establish a relationship. The present paper re‐examines the existing evidence. The review reinforces the need to exercise caution before asserting that enterprise bargaining is necessarily beneficial for workplace productivity. The main conclusion that emanates from this review, however, is not the absence of a clear‐cut finding, but how poorly developed the relevant research literature is.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne Loundes & Yi‐Ping Tseng & Mark Wooden, 2003. "Enterprise Bargaining and Productivity in Australia: What do We Know?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(245), pages 245-258, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:79:y:2003:i:245:p:245-258:b
    DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-4932.2003.00080.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-4932.2003.00080.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1046/j.1475-4932.2003.00080.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dean Parham, 2004. "Sources of Australia's Productivity Revival," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 80(249), pages 239-257, June.
    2. Samantha Farmakis‐Gamboni & David Prentice, 2011. "When Does Reducing Union Bargaining Power Increase Productivity? Evidence from the Workplace Relations Act," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 87(279), pages 603-616, December.
    3. Fry-Mckibbin, Renée & Greenwood-Nimmo, Matthew & Kima, Richard & Volkov, Vladimir, 2025. "A three-sector structural VAR model for Australia," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Wu, Cheng-Lung & Lim, Shao Xuan, 2021. "Effects of enterprise bargaining and agreement clauses on the operating cost of airline ground crew scheduling," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Mark Wooden, 2006. "Implications of Work Choices Legislation," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 99-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:79:y:2003:i:245:p:245-258:b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.