IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecinqu/v58y2020i1p169-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grind Or Gamble? An Experiment On Effort And Spread Seeking In Contests

Author

Listed:
  • Ola Andersson
  • Håkan J. Holm
  • Erik Wengström

Abstract

We conduct a contest experiment to study if spread seeking and effort can be managed when participants can invest in increasing both the mean and the spread of an uncertain performance variable. Subjects are treated with different prize schemes and in accordance with theory, we observe higher investments in spread for the winner‐take‐all scheme. Both types of investments can be controlled with a three‐level prize scheme. However, the control management is imperfect and behavior is characterized by inertia. We also explore the correlation between effort and spread across subjects and find that is robustly positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Ola Andersson & Håkan J. Holm & Erik Wengström, 2020. "Grind Or Gamble? An Experiment On Effort And Spread Seeking In Contests," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(1), pages 169-183, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:58:y:2020:i:1:p:169-183
    DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12852
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecin.12852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usvitskiy, Alexander, 2022. "Strategic risk-taking in dynamic contests," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 511-534.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:58:y:2020:i:1:p:169-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.