IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023is2ne12759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do remote outer island populations in the Pacific think about foreign aid? Insights from Mauke, Cook Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Andreas Kessler

Abstract

Motivation Pacific aid research has largely focused on national issues and social justice, rather than spatial justice and the development of remote outer islands. In particular, the perspectives of remote outer island populations on aid have not previously been assessed. Purpose This study explores the experiences and views of the population of a remote Pacific outer island, Mauke in the Cook Islands, on the foreign aid they receive. By listening to and learning from local people living with aid on a remote outer island, this article seeks to address spatially insensitive Pacific aid research and policy. Based on these insights, the article derives policy implications for aid and development actors working on Mauke and other remote outer islands in the Pacific. Methods and approach Employing a mixed‐methods approach, this article draws on field research conducted on Mauke, involving in‐depth semi‐structured interviews and a quantitative survey. Findings The people of Mauke are divided about whether the island should receive more or less aid. Those calling for more aid tend to be younger; they stress the need for infrastructure development. Those advocating for less aid tend to be older; they argue that aid has harmed Mauke by decreasing endogenous initiatives and creating social tensions, both of which reduce social cohesion among the remote island population. Policy implications Rather than investing in “community‐based/−led development”—doing development with the community, aid to remote Pacific outer islands should focus more on “community development”—with the aim of enhancing social cohesion among peripheral islands. Donors, governments, and development partners must carefully reflect on the degree to which their interventions may harm social cohesion and the endogenous development potential of remote outer island populations. These implications matter given the persistence of uncritical (mis)representations and (mis)conceptions of remote Pacific outer island populations as harmonious and mutually supportive.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Andreas Kessler, 2023. "What do remote outer island populations in the Pacific think about foreign aid? Insights from Mauke, Cook Islands," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s2:n:e12759
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stacy‐ann Robinson, 2020. "Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    2. Patrina Dumaru, 2010. "Community‐based adaptation: enhancing community adaptive capacity in Druadrua Island, Fiji," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(5), pages 751-763, September.
    3. Terence Wood & Sabit Otor & Matthew Dornan, 2022. "Why are aid projects less effective in the Pacific?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yunmeng & Na, Mula & Guo, Ying & Liu, Xingping & Tong, Zhijun & Zhang, Jiquan & Zhao, Chunli, 2023. "Dynamic vulnerability assessment of maize under low temperature and drought concurrent stress in Songliao Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    2. Niaz Ahmed Khan & Junaid Kabir Choudhury & A. Z. M. Manzoor Rashid & Mohammad Raqibul Hasan Siddique & Karishma Sinha, 2022. "Co-Management Practices by Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) in Selected Coastal Forest Zones of Bangladesh: A Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Kevin Grecksch & Carola Klöck, 0. "Access and allocation in climate change adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    4. Kevin Grecksch & Carola Klöck, 2020. "Access and allocation in climate change adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 271-286, June.
    5. Elissa Waters & Jon Barnett, 2018. "Spatial imaginaries of adaptation governance: A public perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 708-725, June.
    6. Asirul Haque & Md. Habibur Rahman & Md. Habibur Rahman & Dilara Rahman, 2019. "An Evaluation of Sea Level Rise Vulnerability and Resilience Strategy to Climate Change in the Coastline of Bangladesh," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 56-70, March.
    7. Donghyun Kim & Jung Eun Kang, 2018. "Integrating climate change adaptation into community planning using a participatory process: The case of Saebat Maeul community in Busan, Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 669-690, July.
    8. Seyedvahid Vakili & Fabio Ballini & Alessandro Schönborn & Anastasia Christodoulou & Dimitrios Dalaklis & Aykut I. Ölçer, 2023. "Assessing the macroeconomic and social impacts of slow steaming in shipping: a literature review on small island developing states and least developed countries," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Muhammad Hammad Rasool & Maqsood Ahmad & Muhammad Ayoub, 2023. "Selecting Geological Formations for CO 2 Storage: A Comparative Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.
    10. Ali Uğur Özcan & Javier Velázquez & Víctor Rincón & Derya Gülçin & Kerim Çiçek, 2022. "Assessment of the Morphological Pattern of the Lebanon Cedar under Changing Climate: The Mediterranean Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Michalis I. Vousdoukas & Panagiotis Athanasiou & Alessio Giardino & Lorenzo Mentaschi & Alessandro Stocchino & Robert E. Kopp & Pelayo Menéndez & Michael W. Beck & Roshanka Ranasinghe & Luc Feyen, 2023. "Small Island Developing States under threat by rising seas even in a 1.5 °C warming world," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1552-1564, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s2:n:e12759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.