IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v35y2017i6p823-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of donor engagement with education policy development in Lao PDR from 1991 to 2000

Author

Listed:
  • Phouvanh Phommalangsy
  • Eileen Honan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Phouvanh Phommalangsy & Eileen Honan, 2017. "An analysis of donor engagement with education policy development in Lao PDR from 1991 to 2000," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(6), pages 823-838, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:35:y:2017:i:6:p:823-838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/dpr.12270
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Knack, 2014. "Building or Bypassing Recipient Country Systems: Are Donors Defying the Paris Declaration?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 839-854, June.
    2. Goran Hyden, 2008. "After the Paris Declaration: Taking on the Issue of Power," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(3), pages 259-274, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Brown, 2016. "Putting Paris into practice: Foreign aid, national ownership, and donor alignment in Mali and Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-145, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Philip Keefer & Christopher Kilby, 2021. "Introduction to the special issue: In memoriam Stephen Knack," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 473-493, July.
    3. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Institutional bypass and aid effectiveness in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-22, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. William Hynes & Patrick Holden, 2012. "What future for the Global Aid for Trade Initiative? Towards a fairer assessment of its achievements and limitations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp421, IIIS.
    5. James Copestake & Richard Williams, 2014. "Political-Economy Analysis, Aid Effectiveness and the Art of Development Management," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 32(1), pages 133-153, January.
    6. Axel Dreher & Jenny Simon & Justin Valasek, 2021. "Optimal decision rules in multilateral aid funds," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 689-719, July.
    7. Yanguas, Pablo & Hulme, David, 2015. "Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 209-219.
    8. Pádraig Carmody, 2008. "Matrix Governance, Cruciform Sovereignty and the Poverty Regime in Africa," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp267, IIIS.
    9. Matthew Dornan, 2017. "How new is the ‘new’ conditionality? Recipient perspectives on aid, country ownership and policy reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 46-63, July.
    10. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    11. Rudolph, Alexandra, 2017. "The concept of SDG-sensitive development cooperation: implications for OECD-DAC members," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Warwick E. Murray & John D. Overton, 2011. "Neoliberalism is dead, long live neoliberalism? Neostructuralism and the international aid regime of the 2000s," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 11(4), pages 307-319, July.
    13. Abrams M. E. Tagem, 2023. "The dynamic effects of aid and taxes on government spending," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(6), pages 1656-1687, December.
    14. Knack, Stephen, 2013. "It's only words : validating the CPIA governance assessments," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6526, The World Bank.
    15. Cameron Camille & Low Sally, 2012. "Aid-effectiveness and Donor Coordination from Paris to Busan: A Cambodian Case Study," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 167-193, December.
    16. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2012. "Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-030, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Benjamin Miller, 2016. "Does AID Effectiveness Mean Repairing the World?: an Examination Of Tikkun Olam's Implications for Modern AID Effectiveness Standards," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 81-88, July.
    18. Lena Gutheil & Dirk‐Jan Koch, 2023. "Civil society organizations and managerialism: On the depoliticization of the adaptive management agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    19. Haley J. Swedlund & Malte Lierl, 2020. "The rise and fall of budget support: Ownership, bargaining and donor commitment problems in foreign aid," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 50-69, May.
    20. Molly den Heyer & Dustin Johnson, 2020. "Exploring the complexity of partnerships in development policy and practice: Upstairs and downstairs," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 133-147, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:35:y:2017:i:6:p:823-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.