IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v33y2015i4p479-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Poverty Reduction to Mutual Interests? The Debate on Differentiation in EU Development Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Svea Koch

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="dpr12119-abs-0001"> Aid to middle-income countries has become one of the most discussed issues among development researchers and in the current modernisation of the development policy of the European Union. This article argues that the question needs to be dealt with in the context of two interlinked challenges: (i) the need to reconceptualise dominant approaches to global poverty reduction beyond national income, and (ii) the growing range of global challenges and the strategically important role of middle-income countries. For EU development policy, the implications are twofold: (i) a better-co-ordinated cross-country division of labour, and (ii) a diversification of objectives towards a global rationale of development policy involving closer co-ordination with other EU external policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Svea Koch, 2015. "From Poverty Reduction to Mutual Interests? The Debate on Differentiation in EU Development Policy," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 33(4), pages 479-502, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:479-502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/dpr.2015.33.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Araz Taeihagh, 2017. "Crowdsourcing, Sharing Economies and Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(2), pages 191-222, June.
    2. Andy Sumner, 2016. "The world's two new middles: Growth, precarity, structural change, and the limitations of the special case," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-34, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Islam Jusufi, 2018. "Aid and its impact on domestic change: The case of police reforms in Macedonia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 743-758, October.
    4. Sven Grimm & Christine Hackenesch, 2017. "China in Africa: What challenges for a reforming European Union development policy? Illustrations from country cases," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(4), pages 549-566, July.
    5. Andy Sumner, 2016. "The world's two new middles Growth, precarity, structural change, and the limitations of the special case," WIDER Working Paper Series 034, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Gonsior, Victoria & Klingebiel, Stephan, 2019. "The development policy system under pressure: acknowledging limitations, sourcing advantages and moving towards a broader perspective," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Koch, Svea & Friesen, Ina & Keijzer, Niels, 2021. "EU development policy as a crisis-response tool? Prospects and challenges for linking the EU's COVID-19 response to the green transition," IDOS Discussion Papers 27/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Eric Yaw Naminse & Jincai Zhuang, 2018. "Does farmer entrepreneurship alleviate rural poverty in China? Evidence from Guangxi Province," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:479-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.