IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v15y2007i5p969-978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating the Minefields of Corporate Vote‐Buying

Author

Listed:
  • Luh Luh Lan
  • Loizos Heracleous

Abstract

Corporate vote‐buying has received significant attention in the last decade, in several legal cases that illustrate the fine line between legitimate use of vote harnessing as a useful corporate strategic tool on one hand, and its negative connotations as a potential instrument of fraud that attempts to disfranchise shareholders on the other hand. After a brief outline of the legal history of corporate vote‐buying and the rationale for the courts’ vigilance on this practice, in both the United States and the United Kingdom, we outline some strategic reasons for vote‐buying that might make it a useful option in certain circumstances. Lastly we discuss key principles that a board of directors should bear in mind when engaging in corporate vote‐buying, so that it can employ the practice productively and legitimately, keeping in mind shareholders’ best interests and avoiding potentially costly and destructive legal challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Luh Luh Lan & Loizos Heracleous, 2007. "Negotiating the Minefields of Corporate Vote‐Buying," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 969-978, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:15:y:2007:i:5:p:969-978
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00616.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00616.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00616.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:15:y:2007:i:5:p:969-978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.