Evaluation of Board Work in Fifteen Companies Belonging to the City of Stockholm
The article outlines characteristics of governance of companies owned by municipalities in Sweden and reports on the results of board evaluation of fifteen companies belonging to the city of Stockholm using gap analysis as a method. The contribution of the boards to a corporate governance model proposed in this article and to compliance with a Swedish code of best practice were analysed. Respondents were asked to answer questions about the importance of an issue and to what extent it had been carried out. Separate assessments of the role of the chairs and that of board members were made. Each of them evaluated the contribution of the other. An appraisal of the chair by the CEO was also included. The results show that board members had a good understanding of their duties, but there was a considerable gap with respect to their performance. Functions that are vital to corporate governance - strategy and control - gave low values. Only some board members took an active part in decisions. The boards' task to follow up on terms of references also gave a low rating. The practice of committee work was not established, except for an executive committee. There was a lack of follow up on internal control. The performance of the chairs was evaluated to find clues to low ratings. Self assessment of the chair gave the largest gaps between importance and actual performance on answers regarding board leadership. Board members and CEOs gave the chairs constantly lower values than the chairs gave themselves. The results however indicate differences between boards with regard to their performance. The results can serve as a basis for discussions between chairs and board members about board performance. Implications for boards and for owners of companies are highlighted. Copyright (c) 2007 The Author; Journal compilation (c) 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 15 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:15:y:2007:i:2:p:159-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.