IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v64y2026i2p286-298.html

Common Pressures, Uneven Trajectories: The Variegated Europeanisation of Wage Regulation Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Maccarrone

Abstract

The debate on whether national industrial relations (IR) are experiencing convergence is a long‐standing one. Recently, scholars argue that we are witnessing a neoliberal convergence of national IR, understood as an increase in employers’ discretion. Much of this discussion has focused on countries of the European Union (EU) as empirical test cases. Hence, this debate has intertwined with that on the effects of the process of European integration on national IR. Drawing insights from the economic geography literature and the perspective of ‘variegated neoliberalisation’, this article argues that neoliberalisation and Europeanisation on IR should be seen as intertwined processes, which are, however, constitutively variegated. Through a multi‐level research design, the article applies this theoretical framework to one key function of national IR, that is, wage regulation, with a focus on Ireland and Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Maccarrone, 2026. "Common Pressures, Uneven Trajectories: The Variegated Europeanisation of Wage Regulation Institutions," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 286-298, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:286-298
    DOI: 10.1111/bjir.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/bjir.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:286-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.