IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v64y2026i1p5-20.html

The Enshittification of Work: Platform Decay and Labour Conditions in the Gig Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Michael David Maffie
  • Hector Hurtado

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms by which gig platforms degrade labour conditions over time, building on the concept of platform decay, or ‘enshittification’, initially developed in the context of social media platforms. In this article, we draw on 30 interviews with long‐term gig workers in the ride‐hail and grocery delivery sectors, offering insights into how these companies shift from offering attractive working conditions to exploiting labour as these services develop market power via network effects. We identify three mechanisms through which gig companies claw back value from workers over time: burden shifting (transferring operational costs to workers), feature addition and alteration (increasing the demands on workers), and market manipulation (reducing worker bargaining power). We then explore how workers respond to platform decay, finding that workers adopt three responses: effort recalibration, multi‐homing and navigating the changing conditions through what we term toxic resilience. This study contributes to the gig work literature by developing a framework to explain how working conditions in the gig economy improve or degrade over time. In doing so, this article provides a framework for organizing the growing constellation of labour research on gig workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael David Maffie & Hector Hurtado, 2026. "The Enshittification of Work: Platform Decay and Labour Conditions in the Gig Economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 5-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:5-20
    DOI: 10.1111/bjir.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/bjir.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:5-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.