IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v63y2025i3p429-444.html

Does Voice Gap Influence Workers’ Job Attitudes and Well‐Being? Measuring Voice as a Dimension of Job Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Yaminette Díaz‐Linhart
  • Thomas Kochan
  • Arrow Minster
  • Dongwoo Park
  • Duanyi Yang

Abstract

This article investigates worker voice as a dimension of job quality and examines its link with job‐related outcomes. We refine and test a multi‐measure concept of the ‘voice gap’ to capture how much influence workers expect to have compared to what they actually have on a set of work‐related issues. Analysing a survey of 1307 American workers, we find that workers distinguish between a voice gap on issues related to their own interests (‘worker‐issues voice gap’) and those related to their employing organization's interests (‘organizational‐strategy voice gap’). Even after controlling for other dimensions of job quality, a larger voice gap is statistically associated with lower job satisfaction and well‐being, as well as higher levels of burnout and turnover intention. Additionally, we find that worker‐issues voice gap has a stronger and more significant effect than an organizational‐strategy voice gap. Based on these results, we recommend incorporating the voice gap measure in future worker voice research and as a practical tool for evaluating voice as a dimension of job quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaminette Díaz‐Linhart & Thomas Kochan & Arrow Minster & Dongwoo Park & Duanyi Yang, 2025. "Does Voice Gap Influence Workers’ Job Attitudes and Well‐Being? Measuring Voice as a Dimension of Job Quality," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(3), pages 429-444, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:63:y:2025:i:3:p:429-444
    DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12866
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/bjir.12866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujishiro, Kaori & Heaney, Catherine A., 2017. "“Doing what I do best”: The association between skill utilization and employee health with healthy behavior as a mediator," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 235-243.
    2. Virginia Doellgast & Matthew Bidwell & Alexander J. S. Colvin, 2021. "New Directions in Employment Relations Theory: Understanding Fragmentation, Identity, and Legitimacy," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 555-579, May.
    3. David Card & Alexandre Mas & Enrico Moretti & Emmanuel Saez, 2012. "Inequality at Work: The Effect of Peer Salaries on Job Satisfaction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2981-3003, October.
    4. Alex Bryson & Richard Freeman, 2013. "Employee Perceptions of Working Conditions and the Desire for Worker Representation in Britain and the US," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Golo Henseke, 2018. "Good jobs, good pay, better health? The effects of job quality on health among older European workers," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(1), pages 59-73, January.
    6. Gary S. FIELDS, 2003. "Decent work and development policies," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(2), pages 239-262, June.
    7. Joel Goh & Jeffrey Pfeffer & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2016. "The Relationship Between Workplace Stressors and Mortality and Health Costs in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 608-628, February.
    8. Arne L. Kalleberg & Stephen Vaisey, 2005. "Pathways to a Good Job: Perceived Work Quality among the Machinists in North America," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 431-454, September.
    9. John Kallas & Dongwoo Park & Rachel Aleks, 2023. "Breaking the deadlock: How union and employer tactics affect first contract achievement," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 223-241, May.
    10. Janine Berg & Francis Green & Laura Nurski & David A Spencer, 2023. "Risks to job quality from digital technologies: Are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(4), pages 347-365, December.
    11. Paul Osterman, 2022. "How American Adults Obtain Work Skills: Results of a New National Survey," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(3), pages 578-607, May.
    12. Linn Van Dyne & Soon Ang & Isabel C. Botero, 2003. "Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1359-1392, September.
    13. Palan, Stefan & Schitter, Christian, 2018. "Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 22-27.
    14. Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren & Patrick Kline & Emmanuel Saez, 2014. "Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(4), pages 1553-1623.
    15. Kristin Behfar & Gerardo A. Okhuysen, 2018. "Perspective—Discovery Within Validation Logic: Deliberately Surfacing, Complementing, and Substituting Abductive Reasoning in Hypothetico-Deductive Inquiry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 323-340, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stinglhamber, Florence & Ohana, Marc & Demoulin, Stephanie, 2025. "Backfire effect of organizational pressure to behave unethically: The roles of organizational dehumanization and moral attentiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. John Kallas, 2025. "What If You Mobilize Effectively and Still Do Not Win? Reclaiming a Relational Understanding of Strike Outcomes and Employer Power Resources," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 233-246, June.
    3. Drouvelis, Michalis & Marx, Benjamin M., 2018. "Prosociality spillovers of working with others," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 205-216.
    4. Parke, Michael R. & Tangirala, Subrahmaniam & Sanaria, Apurva & Ekkirala, Srinivas, 2022. "How strategic silence enables employee voice to be valued and rewarded," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Hajdu, Gábor, 2021. "Perceived income inequality and subjective social status in Europe," GLO Discussion Paper Series 926, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Noy, Shakked & Sin, Isabelle, 2021. "The effects of neighbourhood and workplace income comparisons on subjective wellbeing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 918-945.
    7. Maurice Dunaiski & Janne Tukiainen, 2023. "Does income transparency affect support for redistribution? Evidence from Finland's tax day," Discussion Papers 159, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    8. Liwen Chen & Zhong-Xing Su & Guanghua Wang & Fang Lee Cooke, 2025. "What they want to say and what they say: Employee voice gap and associated outcomes in the Chinese context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 1833-1888, September.
    9. Kang, Songman & Son, Hyelim & Song, B.K., 2023. "The effect of housing price inequality on mental health," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Christopher Hoy & Franziska Mager, 2019. "Why are relatively poor people not more supportive of redistribution? Evidence from a survey experiment across 10 countries," Working Papers 489, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    11. Diogo G. C. Britto & Alexandre Fonseca & Paolo Pinotti & Breno Sampaio & Lucas Warwar, 2022. "Intergenerational Mobility in the Land of Inequality," CESifo Working Paper Series 10004, CESifo.
    12. Boneva, Teodora & Golin, Marta & Kaufmann, Katja Maria & Rauh, Christopher, 2022. "Beliefs about Maternal Labor Supply," IZA Discussion Papers 15788, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Jo Blanden, 2019. "Intergenerational income persistence," World of Labour, LISER, pages 176-176, January.
    14. Hai Kyong Kim & Kibok Baik & Najung Kim, 2019. "How Korean Leadership Style Cultivates Employees’ Creativity and Voice in Hierarchical Organizations," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    15. O. Chanel & S. Luchini & M. Teschl & A. Trannoy, 2025. "Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(3), pages 717-747, September.
    16. Boris Maciejovsky & Gunyawee Teekathananont & Patricia Chen & Stephen M. Garcia, 2025. "Standard-Based Entitlement: How Relative Performance Disclosure Affects Pay Requests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 615-630, December.
    17. Shi, Zheng, 2023. "The impact of regional ICT development on job quality of the employee in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    18. Maia Güell & Michele Pellizzari & Giovanni Pica & José V. Rodríguez Mora, 2018. "Correlating Social Mobility and Economic Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 353-403, July.
    19. Thiago Henrique Leite & Marina Silva Cunha, 2024. "Intergenerational Educational Mobility in Brazil: Trends and Patterns," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 19-45, August.
    20. Valeria Fanghella & Thi-Thanh-Tam Vu & Luigi Mittone, 2021. "Priming prosocial behavior and expectations in response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- Evidence from an online experiment," Papers 2102.13538, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:63:y:2025:i:3:p:429-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.