IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v34y2001i3p356-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hitchhiker's Guide to the World's Household Panel Data Sets

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Haisken‐DeNew

Abstract

This article describes four household panel data sets: the American Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the German Socio‐Economic Panel, the British Household Panel Study, the Canadian Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics and the Cross‐National Equivalent File.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Haisken‐DeNew, 2001. "A Hitchhiker's Guide to the World's Household Panel Data Sets," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 34(3), pages 356-366, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:34:y:2001:i:3:p:356-366
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.00205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8462.00205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fengyu Wu, 2020. "An Examination of the Effects of Consumption Expenditures on Life Satisfaction in Australia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(8), pages 2735-2771, December.
    2. Christopher L. Ambrey & Peter Daniels, 2017. "Happiness and footprints: assessing the relationship between individual well-being and carbon footprints," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 895-920, June.
    3. Markus H. Hahn & John P. Haisken-DeNew, 2013. "PanelWhiz and the Australian Longitudinal Data Infrastructure in Economics," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(3), pages 379-386, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:34:y:2001:i:3:p:356-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.