IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v22y2012i4p371-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Client Importance and Auditor Independence: The Effect of the Asian Financial Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Gaoguang (Stephen) Zhou
  • Xindong (Kevin) Zhu

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaoguang (Stephen) Zhou & Xindong (Kevin) Zhu, 2012. "Client Importance and Auditor Independence: The Effect of the Asian Financial Crisis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(4), pages 371-383, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:22:y:2012:i:4:p:371-383
    DOI: j.1835-2561.2012.00195.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00195.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1835-2561.2012.00195.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Yu-Shan & Chiang, Chia-Yu & Liu, Li-Lin (Sunny) & Xie, Xinmei (Lucy), 2019. "Audit partner independence and business affiliation: evidence from Taiwan," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Kwang Wuk Oh & Seok Woo Jeong & Seon Mi Kim & Seung Weon Yoo, 2017. "The Effect of IPO Risks on Auditors’ Decisions: Auditor Designation Case," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 421-441, December.
    3. Huang, Haozhi & Li, Mingsheng & Shi, Jing, 2016. "Which matters: “Paying to play” or stable business relationship? Evidence on analyst recommendation and mutual fund commission fee payment," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 403-423.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:22:y:2012:i:4:p:371-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.