IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v57y2026i1ne70089.html

Preferences for Bundled Index‐Based Livestock Insurance: Evidence From Northern Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku
  • Ibrahim Ochenje
  • Jamleck Osiemo
  • Rupsha Banerjee
  • Tanaya DuttaGupta
  • Duncan Khalai

Abstract

Considerable attention has been placed on bundled index insurance to enhance climate resilience, address multiple risks simultaneously, and increase the adoption of agricultural technologies. We conducted an endow‐and‐exchange choice experiment with 1,828 female and male livestock keepers in northern Kenya to elicit their preferences for bundled index‐based livestock insurance (IBLI). We measured relative willingness to pay (WTP) as the maximum amount of money that an individual is willing to pay to switch from one bundle to another. We found that livestock keepers were willing to pay 19%–33%, 100%–153%, and 148%–232% more for IBLI + animal nutrition, IBLI + animal health, and IBLI + flexible package, respectively, relative to IBLI + animal breed. Relative to the average WTP to switch from other bundles to IBLI + animal breed, women had 36%–45%, 54%–64%, and 76%–84% higher WTP than men for IBLI + animal nutrition, IBLI + animal health, and IBLI + flexible package, respectively. Providing information about bundled products and seasonal vegetation forecasts reduced the relative WTP for IBLI + animal nutrition. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the differential preferences of women and men when designing and promoting bundled IBLI products.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku & Ibrahim Ochenje & Jamleck Osiemo & Rupsha Banerjee & Tanaya DuttaGupta & Duncan Khalai, 2026. "Preferences for Bundled Index‐Based Livestock Insurance: Evidence From Northern Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70089
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.70089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.70089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.