Author
Listed:
- Yefan Nian
- Zhifeng Gao
- Rodolfo M. Nayga
- Yuning Zhao
- Joanna Van Asselt
Abstract
Past studies have shown that asking stated attribute non‐attendance (ANA) questions at the choice task level can improve the accuracy of revealing participants' ANA information in choice experiments (CEs). However, the impact of such questions on CE participants' underlying choice behaviors in subsequent choice tasks remains underexplored. This study assesses whether and to what extent stated ANA questions within CE choice task sequences introduce learning and fatigue effects by influencing participants' behaviors in CEs, including response time, preference elicitation, choice randomness, and willingness‐to‐pay (WTP). Using a between‐subject design by assigning participants to one of three CEs with different types of stated ANA questions, we found that although choice task level stated ANA questions provided more accurate ANA information, they might lead to participants' longer response time, increased choice randomness, and altered WTP estimates with larger standard deviations, possibly due to increased cognitive burden for participants. Meanwhile, a single randomly placed stated ANA question could also influence CE participants' response time and preferences, but have minimal impact on choice randomness. Therefore, CE practitioners should carefully weigh the enhanced accuracy of ANA behavior measurement against potential disruptions to participants' choice behaviors when including stated ANA questions in CEs.
Suggested Citation
Yefan Nian & Zhifeng Gao & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Yuning Zhao & Joanna Van Asselt, 2026.
"Trade‐Off Between Accuracy and Cognitive Burden: Influence of Stated Attribute Non‐Attendance Questions on Participants' Choice Behaviors,"
Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70070
DOI: 10.1111/agec.70070
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.