IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v57y2026i1ne70063.html

Farmers’ Risk and Ambiguity Preferences and Fertilizer Use Behaviors: Experimental Evidence From Taihu Basin in China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwen Zhang
  • Yingyi Jin
  • Bin Xu

Abstract

Uncertainty in agricultural production often leads to excessive fertilizer use, a major contributor to agricultural non‐point source pollution. This paper studies how farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences impact their fertilizer use behaviors. We conduct the analysis based on a lab‐in‐the‐field experiment in Taihu, China. The experiment results show that farmers are, on average, risk averse in the gain domain and risk seeking in the loss domain, while being ambiguity seeking in gains and ambiguity averse in losses. They tend to exhibit higher probability distortions—overweighting small probabilities and underweighting large probabilities—in ambiguous contexts. We find that ambiguity aversion has a stronger influence on chemical fertilizer use than risk aversion. Moreover, farmers who are reluctant to use organic fertilizers tend to underestimate the probability of potential benefits. Our results suggest that improving farmers’ cognitive ability could potentially reduce chemical fertilizer use, while increasing household income and expanding cropland size may facilitate the adoption of organic fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwen Zhang & Yingyi Jin & Bin Xu, 2026. "Farmers’ Risk and Ambiguity Preferences and Fertilizer Use Behaviors: Experimental Evidence From Taihu Basin in China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70063
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.