IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v56y2025i6p1150-1167.html

The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy in the Agri‐Food Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Raimondi
  • Daniele Curzi
  • Riccardo Lucarno
  • Chiara Falco
  • Alessandro Olper

Abstract

The agri‐food sector is a key contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and is also the economic sector most at risk from climate change. The sector is heavily protected by government intervention, particularly through trade policy, which can have significant environmental implications by either promoting or hindering the trade of polluting versus clean goods. In this paper, we study to what extent the pattern of trade policy hinders or promotes GHG emissions embedded in imported agri‐food goods, focusing on three main pollutants as follows: carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Our findings reveal a significant environmental bias in agri‐food trade policy, with most countries effectively applying a negative carbon tax—that is, an implicit subsidy—for all the pollutants considered. Notably, the structure of the trade policy of the European Union countries implies a substantial implicit carbon subsidy, while more polluting countries, such as China and Brazil, apply smaller carbon subsidies or even a carbon tax. The results have important implications for current mitigation policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Raimondi & Daniele Curzi & Riccardo Lucarno & Chiara Falco & Alessandro Olper, 2025. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy in the Agri‐Food Sector," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(6), pages 1150-1167, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:1150-1167
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.70054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.70054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fontagné, Lionel & Guimbard, Houssein & Orefice, Gianluca, 2022. "Tariff-based product-level trade elasticities," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Olper, Alessandro, 1998. "Political Economy Determinants of Agricultural Protection Levels in EU Member States: An Empirical Investigation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 25(4), pages 463-487.
    3. Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan, 1994. "Protection for Sale," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 833-850, September.
    4. Swinnen, Johan, 2021. "The political economy of agricultural and food policies," IFPRI book chapters, in: Agricultural development: New perspectives in a changing world, chapter 14, pages 471-502, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. repec:cii:cepiei:2012-q2-130-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Houssein Guimbard & Sébastien Jean & Mondher Mimouni & Xavier Pichot, 2012. "MAcMap-HS6 2007, an Exhaustive and Consistent Measure of Applied Protection in 2007," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 130, pages 99-122.
    7. Chepeliev, Maksym & Corong, Erwin, 2022. "Revisiting the environmental bias of trade policies based on an environmentally extended GTAP MRIO Data Base," Conference papers 333478, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Konstantin Stadler & Richard Wood & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Carl†Johan Södersten & Moana Simas & Sarah Schmidt & Arkaitz Usubiaga & José Acosta†Fernández & Jeroen Kuenen & Martin Bruckner & Stefan, 2018. "EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi†Regional Input†Output Tables," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 502-515, June.
    9. Lionel Fontagné & Katheline Schubert, 2023. "The Economics of Border Carbon Adjustment: Rationale and Impacts of Compensating for Carbon at the Border," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 389-424, September.
    10. Joseph S Shapiro, 2021. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 831-886.
    11. Jevan Cherniwchan & Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2017. "Trade and the Environment: New Methods, Measurements, and Results," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 59-85, September.
    12. Valentina Raimondi & Andreea Piriu & Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper, 2023. "Impact of global value chains on tariffs and non-tariff measures in agriculture and food," Post-Print hal-04991950, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carattini, Stefano & Huang, Hanwei & Pisch, Frank & Singh, Tejendra Pratap, 2025. "Trade and the Scopes of Pollution: Evidence from China's World Market Integration," Economics Working Paper Series 2504, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    2. Javier Flórez Mendoza & Oliver Reiter & Robert Stehrer, 2024. "EU carbon border tax: General equilibrium effects on income and emissions," wiiw Working Papers 254, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Cecilia Bellora & Lionel Fontagné & Christophe Gouel & Youssef Salib, 2025. "Carbon Bias of Tariffs: Are Fossil fuels the Culprits?," Working Papers 2025-08, CEPII research center.
    4. Bellora, Cecilia & Fontagné, Lionel, 2023. "EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    5. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    6. Christoph Böhringer & Isha Dube & Carolyn Fischer & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2026. "Border Carbon Adjustments Revisited," CESifo Working Paper Series 12751, CESifo.
    7. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & Mihaly Himics & Robert M'barek, 2016. "Cumulative economic impact of future trade agreements on EU agriculture," JRC Research Reports JRC103602, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Kym Anderson, 2021. "Food policy in a more volatile climate and trade environment," Departmental Working Papers 2021-25, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    9. Pushan Dutt & Devashish Mitra, 2009. "Explaining Agricultural Distortion Patterns," World Bank Publications - Reports 28159, The World Bank Group.
    10. Taipeng LI & Lorenzo Trimarchi & Rui XIE & Guohao YANG, 2023. "The Unintended Consequences of Trade Protection on the Environment," Working Papers ECARES 2023-16, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Langinier, Corinne & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & RayChaudhuri, Amrita, 2025. "Environmental regulations and green innovation: The role of trade and technology transfer," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. Thivierge, Vincent, 2025. "Downstream carbon leakage from upstream carbon tariffs: Evidence from trade tariffs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Ma, Xiangjun & McLaren, John & Chalak, Karim, 2026. "A swing-state theorem, with evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Klotz, Richard & Sharma, Rishi R., 2023. "Trade barriers and CO2," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Robin Sogalla & Joschka Wanner & Yuta Watabe, 2024. "New Trade Models, Same Old Emissions?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11596, CESifo.
    16. Disdier, Anne‐Célia & Emlinger, Charlotte & Fouré, Jean, 2016. "Interdependencies between Atlantic and Pacific agreements: Evidence from agri-food sectors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 241-253.
    17. Dutt, Pushan & Mitra, Devashish, 2009. "Explaining Agricultural Distortion Patterns : The Roles of Ideology, Inequality, Lobbying and Public Finance," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 50299, World Bank.
    18. Amendola, Marco, 2025. "Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Gawande, Kishore & Hoekman, Bernard, 2006. "Lobbying and Agricultural Trade Policy in the United States," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 527-561, July.
    20. Joseph S Shapiro, 2021. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 831-886.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:1150-1167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.