IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v59y2019i2p1055-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further evidence on mandatory partner rotation and audit pricing: a supply‐side perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Ferguson
  • Peter Lam
  • Nelson Ma

Abstract

This study examines effects of mandatory partner rotation (MPR) on audit fees of Australian‐listed companies. Using a fee changes approach, evidence of fee increases in year of the MPR driven by smaller offices of non‐Big 4 auditors is found, consistent with supply‐side resource constraint arguments. Broadly consistent findings are observed using a fee levels approach. Appointment of inexperienced partners to MPR engagements has no discernible effect on fees. Additional analysis of audit reporting lag indicates fee increases reflect additional audit effort as opposed to a pricing strategy. Overall, the evidence supports recent moves by policy‐makers to soften MPR requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Ferguson & Peter Lam & Nelson Ma, 2019. "Further evidence on mandatory partner rotation and audit pricing: a supply‐side perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(2), pages 1055-1100, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:59:y:2019:i:2:p:1055-1100
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12269
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.12269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dhole, Sandip & Mishra, Sagarika & Pal, Ananda Mohan, 2019. "Efficient working capital management, financial constraints and firm value: A text-based analysis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Bedford, Anna & Bugeja, Martin & Czernkowski, Robert & Bond, David, 2023. "Is the effect of shared auditors driven by shared audit partners? The case of M&As," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    3. Yujie Zhao & Nianhang Xu & Donghua Zhou & Kam C. Chan, 2020. "Audit partner rotation and negative information hoarding: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(5), pages 4693-4722, December.
    4. Kris Hardies & Sarowar Hossain & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2021. "Archival research on audit partners: assessing the research field and recommendations for future research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4209-4256, September.
    5. Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei & Omid Faraji & Zabihollah Rezaee & Reza Gholami-Jamkarani & Mehdi Yari, 2024. "Substantive or symbolic compliance with regulation, audit fees and audit quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:59:y:2019:i:2:p:1055-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.