IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bja/isteus/y2026i1p261-283.html

Barriers to agentic ai enterprise transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Roman KUZIV

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman)

Abstract

This study identifies, classifies, and critically analyzes barriers to enterprise transformation under the influence of agentic AI – autonomous software that leverages large language models (LLMs) to perceive its environment, reason through complex tasks, plan and execute actions, and use tools to achieve goals with minimal human oversight. A critical narrative literature review of 30 sources (2019–2026) was conducted. Barriers were identified inductively through open and axial coding; Sociotechnical Systems (STS) theory was then applied as an interpretive lens to map the resulting dimensions onto social and technical subsystems and analyze cross-subsystem interactions. Twenty-nine barriers were classified into five dimensions: technological (7), organizational (7), human (6), governance and regulatory (4), and economic (5). Each barrier was assessed for agentic specificity. Three barriers were identified as agentic-specific (error propagation in multi-agent systems, role ambiguity, accountability diffusion). At the same time, the remaining 26 are carried over from prior digital transformation waves – 22 in amplified form and 4 unchanged. STS mapping based on root-cause analysis revealed that 12 barriers originate in the technical subsystem and 17 in the social subsystem, with governance serving as the social subsystem's primary mechanism for managing the technical subsystem. Five interaction mechanisms were identified, with the majority propagating across the subsystem boundary. Agentic AI transformation barriers constitute an interdependent sociotechnical system rather than isolated obstacles. The governance calibration problem – balancing control with the autonomy that gives agentic AI its value – emerges as the STS joint optimization challenge: governance, as the social subsystem's mechanism for managing the technical subsystem, must simultaneously enable and constrain autonomous operation. The taxonomy provides a diagnostic framework for identifying priority barrier dimensions and understanding cross-dimensional amplification mechanisms. The agentic-specificity classification helps organizations distinguish challenges that require novel approaches from those that are addressable with established practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman KUZIV, 2026. "Barriers to agentic ai enterprise transformation," Economic Synergy, Higher Educational Institution Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific & Technical University, issue 1, pages 261-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:bja:isteus:y:2026:i:1:p:261-283
    DOI: 10.53920/ES-2026-1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://es.istu.edu.ua/index.php/EconomicSynergy/article/view/367/279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53920/ES-2026-1-18?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bja:isteus:y:2026:i:1:p:261-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Duchenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://es.istu.edu.ua/EconomicSynergy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.