IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojhrlj/v2y2017i2p93-119id165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Stakeholder Participation in Governance of Rice Production in Kirinyaga County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Karanja Njoroge

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the participation of key stakeholders in the governance of rice production in Mwea Irrigation Scheme (MIS) in Kirinyaga County in Kenya.Research Methodology: Data were also collected through interview of farmers and employees of National Irrigation Board and MIAD using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was tested using the Cronbach's Alpha Index and showed a high (+0.8) internal consistency and reliability. The study used multi-stage cluster sampling technique to select one zone from the five zones in MIS and randomly selected a sample of 50 farmers from the selected zone. The employees of National Irrigation Board and MIAD were clustered into management and field/technical staff and a purposive sample of 12 and 8, respectively, was drawn from each cluster. A sample of 60 respondents were interviewed. A time series model was used to generate a trend line for rice production. A regression correlation model, generated using SPSS Version 23, was used to analyze the relationship between variables. Findings: The findings showed that farmer participation in governance has a positive and significant relationship to rice production. Specifically, farmers' participation in governance has a positive linearly significant influence on rice production. Further, the study found that the governance role of NIB has a positive and significantly influence on rice production. Finally, the role of MIAD was found to be positively and significantly related to rice production. Specifically, the role of MIAD was found to have a positive linearly significant influence on rice production. The three key stakeholders considered explained a significant variation of 58 per cent in rice production, with NIB role explaining more followed by farmer participation and then MIAD. Recommendation: This study has shown that farmers' participation in governance of rice production has a positive and significant relationship with rice production. It is therefore recommended that their involvement in governance activities be structured so that their participation directly and indirectly through committees or their cooperative is deliberative and meaningful. This means that they participate in discussions, debates and presentations and in making decisions on substantive policy, and operational issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Karanja Njoroge, 2017. "Role of Stakeholder Participation in Governance of Rice Production in Kirinyaga County, Kenya," Human Resource and Leadership Journal, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 93-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojhrlj:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:93-119:id:165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/HRLJ/article/view/165
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Human Resource and Leadership Journal
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kabutha, C. & Mutero, C., 2002. "From government to farmer-managed smallholder rice schemes: The unresolved case of the Mwea Irrigation Scheme in Kenya," IWMI Books, Reports H030876, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Kabutha, C. & Mutero, C., 2002. "From government to farmer-managed smallholder rice schemes: The unresolved case of the Mwea Irrigation Scheme," IWMI Books, Reports H030840, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kikuchi, Masao & Mano, Yukichi & 真野, 裕吉 & Njagi, Tim & Merrey, Douglas & Otsuka, Keijiro, 2019. "Economic Viability of Large-scale Irrigation Construction in 21st Century sub-Saharan Africa: Centering around the Estimation of Construction Costs of Mwea Irrigation Scheme in Kenya," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-87, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. Orindi, V. & Huggins, C., 2005. "The dynamic relationship between property rights, water resource management and poverty in the Lake Victoria Basin," IWMI Books, Reports H038769, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Unknown, 2005. "African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks For Rural Water Management in Africa: an international workshop, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26-28 January 2005," IWMI Conference Proceedings 138989, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Nixon Murathi Kiratu & Eefje Aarnoudse & Martin Petrick, 2025. "Analyzing the impact of irrigation on dietary diversity: a comparison between farmer-led and public irrigation in Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 17(2), pages 493-514, April.
    5. Apind, Benard Owino, "undated". "Determinants Of Smallholder Farmers Market Participation; A Case Study Of Rice Marketing In Ahero Irrigation Scheme," Research Theses 265572, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Caroline Kundu & Masaya Ishii & Kuniaki Sato & Raphael Wanjogu & Daigo Makihara & Akira Yamauchi & Tsugiyuki Masunaga, 2017. "An Assessement of Paddy Production System in Central Kenya with Special Reference to Micronutrients," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 1-49, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojhrlj:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:93-119:id:165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://carijournals.org/journals/HRLJ/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.