IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/amstat/v61y2007mfebruaryp47-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

[MEDICINE] The Use of Statistics in Medical Research: A Comparison of The New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Strasak, Alexander M.
  • Zaman, Qamruz
  • Marinell, Gerhard
  • Pfeiffer, Karl P.
  • Ulmer, Hanno

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Strasak, Alexander M. & Zaman, Qamruz & Marinell, Gerhard & Pfeiffer, Karl P. & Ulmer, Hanno, 2007. "[MEDICINE] The Use of Statistics in Medical Research: A Comparison of The New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 47-55, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bes:amstat:v:61:y:2007:m:february:p:47-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asa/tas/2007/00000061/00000001/art00009
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tracey L Weissgerber, 2021. "Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-5, February.
    2. Kennedy N Otwombe & Max Petzold & Neil Martinson & Tobias Chirwa, 2014. "A Review of the Study Designs and Statistical Methods Used in the Determination of Predictors of All-Cause Mortality in HIV-Infected Cohorts: 2002–2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-6, February.
    3. Hannu Vähänikkilä & Jorma I. Virtanen & Pentti Nieminen, 2016. "How do statistics in dental articles differ from those articles published in highly visible medical journals?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1417-1424, September.
    4. Jelte M Wicherts & Marjan Bakker & Dylan Molenaar, 2011. "Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-7, November.
    5. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bes:amstat:v:61:y:2007:m:february:p:47-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.amstat.org/publications/tas/index.cfm?fuseaction=main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.