IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/readeu/v5y2026i1p56-66.html

Bridge or Barrier? How Digital Competence Predicts Student Attitudes Toward Generative AI Ethics and Usage

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Kevin Astrero

    (Northeastern College, Philippines)

Abstract

With the rapid rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), it is important to examine how GenAI, digital competency, and ethics intersect. The Philippines has few studies that analyze these three categories together; this study seeks to understand better how they interact. It used Structural Equation Modelling to conduct a quantitative correlational investigation on this topic. Stratified random sampling was used to poll 498 college students from diverse institutions in Isabela, Philippines, to ensure demographic and intellectual diversity. Students’ digital competencies, GenAI adoption, and ethical concerns were assessed via an online questionnaire. The study found that students exhibited high digital competence (M = 3.48) and a moderate desire to employ Generative AI (M = 3.24), but moderate ethical concerns (M = 3.15). Males were more willing to use GenAI than females (p = 0.011), and fourth-year students exhibited greater ethical concerns and a greater willingness than first-year students. The regression study showed that willingness to use and moral concerns explained 33.2% of the variance in digital competence. Overall, students are technically ready to use GenAI, but their digital competence and ethical application of it remain lacking. Higher education institutions should offer comprehensive professional development and an inclusive curriculum that integrates technical instruction with a strong moral foundation. The gender gap and changing requirements of students at different year levels should be the focus of these activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Kevin Astrero, 2026. "Bridge or Barrier? How Digital Competence Predicts Student Attitudes Toward Generative AI Ethics and Usage," Research and Advances in Education, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 5(1), pages 56-66, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:readeu:v:5:y:2026:i:1:p:56-66
    DOI: 10.63593/RAE.2788-7057.2026.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/rae/article/view/2056/1916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/RAE.2788-7057.2026.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:readeu:v:5:y:2026:i:1:p:56-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.