IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/frmans/v4y2025i2p104-113.html

Research on the Driving Factors and Pathways of Discontinuous Change in China’s Emergency Management Policies: A Clear Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 20 Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Shuting Chen

    (School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)

Abstract

The change in China’s emergency management policies is largely influenced by emergencies, but not all emergencies drive policy changes. Based on the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory, this paper employs the Clear Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) method to study 20 cases of emergencies in China, categorized into natural disasters, accident disasters, public health incidents, and social security incidents. Combining the actual context of Chinese policy decision-making, the paper focuses on analyzing the driving elements and configuration pathways that lead to discontinuous changes in emergency management policies. The study finds that the shift in high-level attention is a necessary prerequisite for changes in emergency management policies. There are two configuration pathways for policy change, which can be classified into macro-political push type and focal event-induced type. By using the qualitative comparative analysis method to explore and reflect on the mechanisms of emergency management policy change, we can better grasp the inherent laws of policy change from the perspective of condition combinations, providing theoretical insights for the future optimization and adjustment of emergency management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuting Chen, 2025. "Research on the Driving Factors and Pathways of Discontinuous Change in China’s Emergency Management Policies: A Clear Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 20 Cases," Frontiers in Management Science, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(2), pages 104-113, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:104-113
    DOI: 10.56397/FMS.2025.03.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/fms/article/view/1567/1397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/FMS.2025.03.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:104-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.