IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/frmans/v3y2024i2p58-66.html

Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Frameworks on the Success of Green Building Projects in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Aisyah Binte Mahmud

    (Singapore Management University, Singapore)

  • Hakim Bin Rosli

    (Singapore Management University, Singapore)

  • Noraini Binte Hassan

    (Singapore Management University, Singapore)

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of regulatory frameworks on the success of green building projects in Singapore. By analyzing the Building and Construction Authority’s (BCA) Green Mark Scheme and other related regulations, the study highlights how these frameworks have shaped the environmental sustainability practices within the construction industry. Through a mix of qualitative interviews with industry professionals and quantitative analysis of building performance data, the research demonstrates that regulatory frameworks not only enhance environmental outcomes but also drive innovation in building technologies and practices. The findings suggest that while these regulations have led to significant improvements in energy efficiency and resource management, challenges such as high compliance costs and the need for continuous professional development remain. The paper concludes with recommendations for evolving these frameworks to better support sustainable development in Singapore’s urban landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisyah Binte Mahmud & Hakim Bin Rosli & Noraini Binte Hassan, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Frameworks on the Success of Green Building Projects in Singapore," Frontiers in Management Science, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(2), pages 58-66, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:58-66
    DOI: 10.56397/FMS.2024.04.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/fms/article/view/1089/957
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/FMS.2024.04.07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:58-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.