IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/frmans/v3y2024i2p20-25.html

Marketing Failure Case Study — Dolce & Gabbana as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Weiran Feng

    (University of Southampton, UK)

Abstract

In November 2018, Dolce & Gabbana took to social media to warm up for its fashion week in Shanghai by releasing a controversial video in which Dolce & Gabbana models had extreme difficulty eating Italian food — pizza, cannoli, etc — with chopsticks while the video’s narration used a disgusting tone to explain. The video was released to widespread attention and controversy, as it was deemed to be disrespectful of traditional Chinese culture and racist, causing a huge reaction in China, where Dolce & Gabbana cancelled a fashion show scheduled for Wednesday following a boycott by celebrities and social media users, while retail websites around the country such as Jingdong and Alibaba took down Dolce & Gabbana’s products. On top of this, the situation has been further complicated by negative comments about China by Dolce & Gabbana’s designer Stefano Gabbana, which have been widely circulated online. Pressured by the situation, Dolce & Gabbana apologised and claimed that its accounts had been hacked in an attempt to save the Chinese market with this action, but it did not produce any positive trends. Dolce & Gabbana is a luxury brand of Italian origin, which is widely popular worldwide for its unique designs and baroque Mediterranean style, which is different from other luxury brands. It entered the Chinese market in 2005 and in 2018, it has 44 shops in China alone, while major e-commerce websites sell it. In its financial report for mid-2017-2018, it showed a turnover of €1.3 billion (Glyn Atwal et al.).

Suggested Citation

  • Weiran Feng, 2024. "Marketing Failure Case Study — Dolce & Gabbana as an Example," Frontiers in Management Science, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(2), pages 20-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:20-25
    DOI: 10.56397/FMS.2024.04.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/fms/article/view/1078/946
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/FMS.2024.04.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:frmans:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:20-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.