IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjhrl/v2y2017i6p70-88id454.html

An Investigation On The Socio Economic Determinants For Demand For Technical And Vocational Training Among The Youth In Kajiado County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • James Sankale

  • Prof. Maurice M. Sakwa

  • Dr. David J. Ndegwah

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed at establishing the extent to which socio-economic background determines the demand in TVET among the youth in Kajiado County. Methodology: The study used a mixed method design of both qualitative and quantitative methods for the purposes of triangulation. Empirical figures of student enrolment was obtained using standardized formula, followed by in-depth interviews about their study habits and attitudes towards TVETs. Quantitative and qualitative forms of data was linked for three reasons: First, for confirming or corroborating each other via triangulation; second, for elaborating or developing analysis, providing richer details and third, for initiating new lines of thinking through attention to new ideas coming up, as well as and providing fresh insight (Rosmann and Wilson (quoted in Miles & Huberman, 1994). The study was confined to the natural settings and attempted to interpret phenomenon in terms of the meaning that people will bring as asserted by Denzin and Lincoln (2005).The study applied a descriptive cross- sectional survey as its quantitative research design. According to Cooper and Schindler (2003), the research design is appropriate if the study is concerned with finding out what, when, and how much of phenomena. Findings: From the research findings above, it can be inferred that socio economic background influence is key determinant of the demand for TVET courses. The study concludes that affordability of TVET programmes and the competition among household dependants for the acquisition of skills exerts influence on demand for TVET. Some parents nonetheless have challenges meeting the costs of TVET programmes. Given that the cost of TVET courses is uneven as some demand more resources than others; a parent's income possibly determines the choice of the course for their children. If the income is low, the preference will be a cheaper course. This is further complicated by the high cost of living, especially in cases where the number of dependants in the family is high. This reduces some parents' purchasing power to afford the TVET costs relative to their meagre income. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Parents and students should build networks with members of the society who are of higher socio-economic status to enhance the ability of the graduates to gain opportunities in the labour market. The research can aid in advancing both the theoretical and practical knowledge and aims at getting the "˜best practice' to act as a benchmark used in organizational problem solving. It therefore establishes a relationship between performance of youth polytechnics and the level of demand for TVET.

Suggested Citation

  • James Sankale & Prof. Maurice M. Sakwa & Dr. David J. Ndegwah, 2017. "An Investigation On The Socio Economic Determinants For Demand For Technical And Vocational Training Among The Youth In Kajiado County, Kenya," Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, IPRJB, vol. 2(6), pages 70-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjhrl:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:70-88:id:454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/JHRL/article/view/454
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Jorn-Steffen Pischke, 1999. "The Structure of Wages and Investment in General Training," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(3), pages 539-572, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Checchi, Daniele & Visser, Jelle & van de Werfhorst, Herman G., 2007. "Inequality and Union Membership: The Impact of Relative Earnings Position and Inequality Attitudes," IZA Discussion Papers 2691, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Moretti, Luca & Mayerl, Martin & Mühlemann, Samuel & Schlögl, Peter & Wolter, Stefan C., 2017. "So Similar and Yet So Different: A Comparative Analysis of a Firm's Cost and Benefits of Apprenticeship Training in Austria and Switzerland," IZA Discussion Papers 11081, IZA Network @ LISER.
    3. Addison, John T. & Belfield, Clive R., 2004. "Unions, Training, and Firm Performance: Evidence from the British Workplace Employee Relations Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 1264, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Ardiana N. Gashi & Geoff Pugh & Nick Adnett, 2008. "Technological change and employer-provided training: Evidence from German establishments," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0026, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    5. Bhaskar, V & Holden, Steinar, 2002. "Wage Differentiation via Subsidised General Training," Economics Discussion Papers 8851, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    6. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa, 2014. "Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 737-748.
    7. Bingley, P. & Eriksson, T, 2001. "Pay Spread and Skewness. Employee Effort and Firm Productivity," Papers 01-2, Aarhus School of Business - Department of Economics.
    8. Kyota Eguchi, 2010. "Minimum Wages and Trainers' Dilemma," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 24(2), pages 128-138, June.
    9. Sauermann, Jan, 2015. "Worker Reciprocity and the Returns to Training: Evidence from a Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 9179, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Meier, Volker & Schiopu, Ioana, 2015. "Optimal higher education enrollment and productivity externalities in a two-sector model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Marydas, Sneha & Mathew, Nanditha & De Marzo, Giordano & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2025. "Digital Technologies, Hiring, Training, and Firm Outcomes," MERIT Working Papers 2025-004, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Bert Minne & Marc van der Steeg & Dinand Webbink, 2008. "Skill gaps in the EU: role for education and training policies," CPB Document 162, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Garloff Alfred & Kuckulenz Anja, 2006. "Training, Mobility, and Wages: Specific Versus General Human Capital," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 226(1), pages 55-81, February.
    14. Malcomson, James M. & Maw, James W. & McCormick, Barry, 2003. "General training by firms, apprentice contracts, and public policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 197-227, April.
    15. Hans Dietrich & Harald Pfeifer & Felix Wenzelmann, 2016. "The more they spend, the more I earn? Firms' training investments and post-training wages of apprentices," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0116, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    16. Eguchi, Kyota, 2004. "Trainers' dilemma of choosing between training and promotion," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 765-783, December.
    17. Kristjan-Olari Leping, 2005. "Measuring the Specificity of Human Capital: a Skill-based Approach," Working Papers 134, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology.
    18. Lindquist, Matthew J., 2005. "The welfare costs of union wage compression," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 639-658, April.
    19. Michael Gerfin, 2003. "Work-Related Training and Wages: An empirical analysis for male workers in Switzerland," Diskussionsschriften dp0316, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    20. Pardesi, Mantej, 2024. "Productivity convergence and firm’s training strategy," ROA Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjhrl:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:70-88:id:454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/JHRL/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.