IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojajep/v6y2020i7p53-66id1163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-Service Teachers' Theoretical Orientations And Classroom Practices: Analysis Of Espoused Beliefs And Perceived Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Teshome Tola Komo

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the theoretical orientations that influence teaching practices, and the relationships between beliefs and practices of in-service teacher trainees drawn from different parts of Ethiopia who were attending summer training program in different academic departments of the Addis Ababa University. Methodology: Participants of summer in-service program (N=276) were randomly selected from four subject areas and made to complete a self-report questionnaire designed for this purpose. The questionnaire had 40 Likert Scale type items rated over 5 points so as to collect data on beliefs and practices relating to planning, teaching and assessment behaviors of the surveyed teachers. Findings: The Findings indicated that in most of the cases the beliefs and practices of the surveyed teachers aligned with constructivist reform which the Ethiopian Ministry of Education expects all teachers to implement. Congruence between espoused beliefs and perceived practices were noted with evidence of low relationship between the two. The findings have contributions to raising teachers' tacit knowledge of teaching craft. Insights for educational administrators and areas of focus for future research were also identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Teshome Tola Komo, 2020. "In-Service Teachers' Theoretical Orientations And Classroom Practices: Analysis Of Espoused Beliefs And Perceived Practices," African Journal of Education and Practice, IPR Journals and Book Publishers, vol. 6(7), pages 53-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:7:p:53-66:id:1163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/AJEP/article/view/1163
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:7:p:53-66:id:1163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/AJEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.