IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojajep/v6y2020i1p60-71id1048.html

Influence Of Institutional Characteristics On Competitiveness Of Private Universities In Nairobi County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Nene Nderitu

  • Dr. Paul Edabu

  • Dr. Mary Mugwe Chui

Abstract

Purpose: In the last three decades, the republic of Kenya has witnessed a tremendous increase in the number of chartered universities and a stiff competition for students. The student enrolment base coupled with the emergence of private university education providers turned the university arena in Kenya into a student enrolment market, leading to intense competition between Public and Private Universities. The researcher realizes that, the existing studies relate competitiveness to performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the influence of institutional characteristics as a planning strategy on competitiveness of private universities in Nairobi County, Kenya. Resource Based Theory, Competitive Advantage Theory and Generic Framework Theory guided this study. Methodology: The study applied mixed method approach and thus adopted concurrent triangulation design. Target population comprised 66 Registrar Academics, 66 Registrar Admissions and 33 Directors of Marketing all totalling to 165. Using the Central Limit Theorem, 36 Registrars of Academics, 36 Registrars of Admissions and 18 Directors of Marketing were purposively sampled. Questionnaires were used to collect data from Registrar Academic and Admissions whereas interview guide was used to gather data from the Directors of Marketing. Data analysis began by identifying common themes from the respondents' description of their experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically along the objectives and were presented in narrative forms. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential using Chi-Square through Statistical Packages for Social Science and presented using tables. Findings: The study established that institutional characteristics as a planning strategy influence competitiveness of private universities. These include inclusivity, size and leadership styles which have improved enrollment of students in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study recommends that, in order to enroll more students, universities should have a sizable management which involves all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Nene Nderitu & Dr. Paul Edabu & Dr. Mary Mugwe Chui, 2020. "Influence Of Institutional Characteristics On Competitiveness Of Private Universities In Nairobi County, Kenya," African Journal of Education and Practice, IPR Journals and Book Publishers, vol. 6(1), pages 60-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:60-71:id:1048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/AJEP/article/view/1048
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim R. Holcomb & R. Michael Holmes Jr. & Brian L. Connelly, 2009. "Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 457-485, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García-Meca, Emma & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2018. "Does managerial ability influence the quality of financial reporting?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 544-557.
    2. Sahay, Arvind, 2013. "A Customer Oriented Approach To Identifying Competitive Advantage," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-05-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    3. D'Mello, Ranjan & Kwon, Sungjoung & Toscano, Francesca, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and the executive-employee pay disparity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Jun Li & Xi chen & Chengyuan Wang & Ying Wang, 2025. "Centralization or decentralization? The effect of managerial ability on supply chain concentration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(2), pages 2727-2748, December.
    5. SooGeun Ahn & Jeewhan Yoon & YoungJun Kim, 2018. "The innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises and their growth: quantile regression analysis and structural equation modeling," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 316-342, April.
    6. Jamal Shamsie & Michael J. Mannor, 2013. "Looking Inside the Dream Team: Probing Into the Contributions of Tacit Knowledge as an Organizational Resource," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 513-529, April.
    7. Jenny María Ruiz-Jiménez & Matilde Ruiz-Arroyo & María Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, 2021. "The impact of effectuation, causation, and resources on new venture performance: novice versus expert entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1761-1781, December.
    8. Efstathios Magerakis & Ahsan Habib, 2022. "Environmental uncertainty and corporate cash holdings: The moderating role of CEO ability," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 402-432, September.
    9. Kuzman Tanja & Bellos Sotirios K. & Đulić Katarina, 2018. "Determinants of Innovation-based Sustainability in Transition and Developing Economies," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(3), pages 413-438, September.
    10. Francis M. Mathooko & Martin Ogutu, 2014. "Coping Strategies Adopted by Public Universities in Kenya in Response to Environmental Changes," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 93-107, February.
    11. Joel Harper & Kristopher J. Kemper & Li Sun, 2019. "Managerial ability and bond rating changes," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 381-401, December.
    12. Lanza, Andrea & Simone, Giuseppina & Bruno, Randolph, 2016. "Resource orchestration in the context of knowledge resources acquisition and divestment. The empirical evidence from the Italian “Serie A” football," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 145-157.
    13. Hanisch, David N. & Rau, Sabine B., 2014. "Application of metric conjoint analysis in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 72-84.
    14. Townsend, David M. & Busenitz, Lowell W., 2015. "Turning water into wine? Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in early-stage capitalization processes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 292-306.
    15. Willem Smit, 2023. "Top Manager Heuristics Under Knightian Uncertainty: Control Versus Prediction and the Moderating Impact of Framing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1302-1340, July.
    16. Charles E. Eesley & Yong Suk Lee, 2021. "Do university entrepreneurship programs promote entrepreneurship?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 833-861, April.
    17. Lu Zhang & Boyang Hao & Dan Yang & Guojun Wang, 2024. "Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1731-1762, November.
    18. W. David Allen & Donald J. Schepker & Clint Chadwick, 2022. "Firms' responses to changes in frictions in related human capital factor markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1347-1373, July.
    19. Gallucci, Carmen & Santulli, Rosalia & Calabrò, Andrea, 2015. "Does family involvement foster or hinder firm performance? The missing role of family-based branding strategies," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 155-165.
    20. Tian, Xiaowen & Slocum, John W., 2015. "The decline of global market leaders," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 15-25.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:60-71:id:1048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/AJEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.