IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojajep/v6y2020i1p47-59id1044.html

Assessment Of The Influence Of Classroom Material Support On Gender Equity In Education In Primary Schools In Isinya Sub-County, Kajiado County

Author

Listed:
  • Kennedy Odhiambo Arogo

  • Dr. Mary Mugwe

  • Dr. Ruth Thinguri

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of classroom material support as an education production function on gender equity in education in Isinya Sub-County, Kajiado County-Kenya. Methodology: The study employed production function and structural functionalism theories. It adopted pragmatic (mixed) approach methodology. Concurrent triangulation research design was used to conduct the study. The data analysis was carried out by comparing the data collected from both questionnaires and interview schedules. The triangulation research design helped to address issues that overlap from both quantitative and qualitative data. The target population of the study was 3258 which consisted of 1896 class seven pupils, 1236 teachers, 122 Headteachers, 3 Sub-County Quality Assurance and Standards Officers (SCQASOs) and 1 Sub-County Director of Education (SCDE). From the target population, the researcher used simple random sampling to select 60 pupils; proportionate sampling was used to select 124 teacher respondents. 12 Headteachers were selected using proportionate sampling procedure. 3 ZQASOs and 1 SCDE were purposely selected giving a total of 200 respondents. Questionnaires were used to collect data from the learners, teachers and headteachers while the interview was for the SCDE and ZQASOs. Findings: Classroom material support is not to the mark. The state of the number of materials is not enough neither is the material provision done with gender equity in mind. Schools with adequate materials tend to thrive in gender equity in education while those that either have inadequate or ill gender sensitive materials are single gender dominated in many areas. Therefore, this affirms that classroom material support influences gender equity in education. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: When doing procurements, the personnel, government and non governmental agencies concerned with matters education materials support should take into consideration materials that encourage learners of both genders. Boys and girls should be provided with the required materials so as to enhance gender equity in education.

Suggested Citation

  • Kennedy Odhiambo Arogo & Dr. Mary Mugwe & Dr. Ruth Thinguri, 2020. "Assessment Of The Influence Of Classroom Material Support On Gender Equity In Education In Primary Schools In Isinya Sub-County, Kajiado County," African Journal of Education and Practice, IPR Journals and Book Publishers, vol. 6(1), pages 47-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:47-59:id:1044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/AJEP/article/view/1044
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Bertrand & Jessica Pan, 2013. "The Trouble with Boys: Social Influences and the Gender Gap in Disruptive Behavior," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 32-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huong Thu Le & Ha Trong Nguyen, 2018. "The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, December.
    2. Sallin, Aurelién, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Economics Working Paper Series 2109, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    3. Esteban M. Aucejo & Jonathan James, 2019. "Catching up to girls: Understanding the gender imbalance in educational attainment within race," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 502-525, June.
    4. Michael Baker & Kevin Milligan, 2016. "Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 399-441.
    5. Huang, Zibin & Jiang, Xu & Sun, Ang, 2024. "Fertility and delayed migration: How son preference protects young girls against mother–child separation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    7. Francisco Díez-Martín & Giorgia Miotto & Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito, 2024. "The intellectual structure of gender equality research in the business economics literature," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1649-1680, June.
    8. Jessica Leight & Elaine M. Liu, 2020. "Maternal Education, Parental Investment, and Noncognitive Characteristics in Rural China," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(1), pages 213-251.
    9. Shelly Lundberg, 2013. "The College Type: Personality and Educational Inequality," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 421-441.
    10. Esteban García-Miralles & Miriam Gensowski, 2025. "Are Children’s Socio-Emotional Skills Shaped by Parental Health Shocks?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 60(5), pages 1560-1596.
    11. Anthony Bald & Eric Chyn & Justine Hastings & Margarita Machelett, 2022. "The Causal Impact of Removing Children from Abusive and Neglectful Homes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(7), pages 1919-1962.
    12. Kristoffersen, Jannie Helene Grøne & Krægpøth, Morten Visby & Nielsen, Helena Skyt & Simonsen, Marianne, 2015. "Disruptive school peers and student outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Boinet, Césarine & Norris, Jonathan & Romiti, Agnese & Shi, Zhan & Telemo, Paul, 2024. "Beliefs on Children's Human Capital Formation and Mothers at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 17574, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Wang Sophie Xuefei, 2014. "The Effect of Parental Migration on the Educational Attainment of Their Left-Behind Children in Rural China," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1037-1080, July.
    15. Sandner, Malte & Jungmann, Tanja, 2017. "Gender-specific effects of early childhood intervention: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 59-78.
    16. Ingvild Almås & Alexander W. Cappelen & Kjell G. Salvanes & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2016. "Willingness to Compete: Family Matters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2149-2162, August.
    17. David Autor & David Figlio & Krzysztof Karbownik & Jeffrey Roth & Melanie Wasserman, 2016. "School Quality and the Gender Gap in Educational Achievement," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 289-295, May.
    18. Letizia Mencarini & Silvia Pasqua & Agnese Romiti, 2014. "Children’s time use and family structure in Italy," CHILD Working Papers Series 27, Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA.
    19. Katja Maria Kaufmann & Yasemin Özdemir & Han Ye, 2022. "Spillover Effects of Old-Age Pension across Generations: Family Labor Supply and Child Outcomes," CESifo Working Paper Series 9813, CESifo.
    20. Jens Dietrichson & Ida Lykke Kristiansen & Bjørn A. Viinholt, 2020. "Universal Preschool Programs And Long‐Term Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1007-1043, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:47-59:id:1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/AJEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.