IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojajep/v1y2016i2p74-82id214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies Considered Effective for Transforming Business Education Programmes to the Needs of 21st Century Workplace in Delta State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • J. C. Nwazor
  • Onokpanu Michel Oghenekaro

Abstract

Purpose: The study was conducted to identify the strategies considered effective for transforming business education programmes to the needs of the 21st century workplace.Methodology: One research question and two hypotheses guided the study. A survey research design was adopted for the study. The population consisted of 122 business education lecturers in tertiary institutions in Delta state. A 17-item questionnaire was used. Mean and standard deviation and z-test were used in the analysis of data.Findings: The study revealed that all the 17-item statements on the strategies for transforming business education programmme to the needs of the 21st century workplace were considered effective.Conclusion and policy recommendations: The study concluded that unless these effective strategies are adopted business education will have little capacity to adequately develop Nigerian graduates of business education to meet the challenges and complexities of the 21st century workplace. The study recommended among others that a closer collaboration between academicians of business education and business executives should be implemented continually in order to help students acquire the necessary 21st century workplace competencies while in school.

Suggested Citation

  • J. C. Nwazor & Onokpanu Michel Oghenekaro, 2016. "Strategies Considered Effective for Transforming Business Education Programmes to the Needs of 21st Century Workplace in Delta State, Nigeria," African Journal of Education and Practice, IPR Journals and Book Publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 74-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:74-82:id:214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/AJEP/article/view/214
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojajep:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:74-82:id:214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/AJEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.