Author
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. Preliminary empirical review revealed that there is need for instructors to prioritize personalized support, timely feedback, and active engagement with learners to foster a supportive and engaging learning environment. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Presence Theory, Self-Determination Theory and the Transactional Distance Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. Instructors should establish clear communication channels and responsive feedback mechanisms to facilitate ongoing interaction with learners. Instructors should provide constructive and personalized feedback that focuses on both strengths and areas for improvement. Instructors should actively foster a sense of community and social presence in online and distance learning environments. Lastly, professional development and training programs should be offered to instructors to enhance their pedagogical skills in online and distance learning
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijodl:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:35-46:id:2001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJODL/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.