Author
Listed:
- John Andrey G. Baylon
(Camarines Norte State College, Philippines)
- Regine Santos Balmaceda
(Camarines Norte State College, Philippines)
Abstract
The avenue of justice in the form of a media-driven dispute resolution program has grown in popularity. Previous studies have explored the influence of media on public perception; however, few studies have critically investigated how these programs deliver resolutions that align with international principles for accountability, inclusivity, and justice. This study aimed to examine how the media-driven dispute resolution programs, specifically the “Pedro Tanggol on Justice†program, provide resolutions to public disputes and assess whether these resolutions align with selected principles of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16—Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. The study utilized a qualitative approach, particularly discourse analysis. Thematic analysis was used to analyze ten episodes that were examined and selected based on the criteria. The Dual Concern Model by Pruitt and Rubin (2004) was utilized to analyze the conflict management styles, such as forcing, avoiding, accommodating, compromising, and integrating styles. Strong adherence to ethical considerations and integration of the criteria of trustworthiness by Lincoln and Guba (1985) were strictly followed. The analysis revealed that the “Pedro Tanggol on Justice†program predominantly employed an accommodating, compromising, and integrating style in addressing and managing disputes. However, instances of forcing style or lack of consideration were also observed. The study found that “Pedro Tanggol on Justice†provided resolution between the disputing parties, both conforming and violating the selected SDG 16 principles. The findings suggest that with the provision of a resolution to public disputes, the program must strengthen ethical standards and consistently align with the principles of SDG 16. This study emphasizes the dual role of media as both a tool for empowerment and a potential threat to sustainable, human rights-based justice.
Suggested Citation
John Andrey G. Baylon & Regine Santos Balmaceda, 2025.
"Justice on Screen: The Provision of Resolution to Public Disputes and its Alignment with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 846-858, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:846-858
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:846-858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.