IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p7940-7965.html

Impact of Ownership Structure on Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Retnam Uthayakumar

    (Senior Lecturer, Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Commerce and Management, Eastern University, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

Public limited companies are generally recognized as the dominant business entities in the financial market and they can contribute much to the economic development of a country. The financial performance is a key for the success of companies. However, it is determined by numerous factors. Corporate Governance, which is defined as the system by which companies are directed and controlled, is considered as one of the significant determinants of the performance of companies. But, the corporate governance is formed by ownership structure, which is represented by the distribution of voting equity shares owned by the shareholders who can be categorized with various identities and magnitudes. This study identified a research problem as a contextual gap in explaining the influence of ownership structure on the variations of financial performance of listed companies in Sri Lanka. Hence, this study examined the level and variations of the ownership structure in terms of ‘Concentration’ and ‘Identities’ of shareholders in the companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka, and it measured the average level and variance in the financial performance of those companies as well. The study further investigated the linear relationship between the ownership structure variables and the financial performance of those companies, and evaluated the direct impact of those variables on their financial performance by controlling company’s characteristics, and applying the Ordinary Least Square Regression. The study was carried out using data collected from a sample of 100 listed companies randomly selected from nineteen different sectors which consist of 290 listed companies in Sri Lanka. The concentration and identity of ownership structure across the companies in a past reporting period were measured as the quantitative interval measure variables by the researcher with the retrospective cross sectional observations on distributions of equity shares from the annual reports of a sample of 100 listed companies for the financial period 2024/2025 ended 31st March 2025. The financial performance of those companies was measured with the indicator of the ROA as a retrospective cross sectional observation, which was calculated as an interval measure by the researcher referring to the annual reports of each company for the same financial period. From the data analysis, it was found that the listed companies in Sri Lanka are characterized with a significant degree of Concentrated Ownership and with the identities of Managerial Ownership, Diffuse (Individuals) Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and Foreign Ownership. Most of these variables have positively correlated with the financial performance indicator (ROA), but, the Diffuse Ownership identity has a negative association with the financial performance of those companies, however, it is found insignificant. Further, the simple and multiple regression analysis revealed the ownership structure variables have a significant positive impact on the financial performance, except the Diffuse Ownership variable. Hence, it is concluded that the various identities of ownership structure are present with significant variations among the listed companies in the Sri Lankan context and they have significant positive influence on the financial performance. However, the Concentrated Ownership structure has the most positive effect on the financial performance, which recommends that the ownership structure dominated by few large shareholders could be the ideal one for improving corporate governance, managerial efficiency, and thereby the financial performance of companies, while the ownership identities, such as Managerial, Institutional, and Foreign ownership, can be significant in directing the companies towards better financial performance. Diffuse ownership could not be recommended for companies in the Sri Lankan context since it does not have sufficient empirical evidence to establish a positive effect. However, large size of observations on these variables can result in different conclusions and implication. This study has only applied the conceptual model that could investigate the direct impact of the ownership structure on the financial performance of companies. If this model is modified to include a mediating or moderating variable related to corporate governance, such as board size, board diversity, and CEO duality, the accuracy of predicting power of ownership concentration and the identities including diffuse ownership on financial performance might be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Retnam Uthayakumar, 2025. "Impact of Ownership Structure on Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Sri Lanka," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 7940-7965, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7940-7965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/7940-7965.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/impact-of-ownership-structure-on-financial-performance-of-listed-companies-in-sri-lanka/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Njagi Kirimi & Samuel Nduati Kariuki & Kennedy Nyabuto Ocharo, 2022. "Ownership structure and financial performance: Evidence from Kenyan commercial banks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Sanghoon Lee, 2008. "Ownership Structure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of South Korea," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2008_17, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    3. Morck, Randall & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1988. "Management ownership and market valuation : An empirical analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 293-315, January.
    4. Alnoor Bhimani, 2008. "Making corporate governance count: the fusion of ethics and economic rationality," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 135-147, May.
    5. Morck, Randall & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1988. "Management ownership and market valuation," Scholarly Articles 29407535, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    6. Gavin J. Nicholson & Geoffrey C. Kiel, 2007. "Can Directors Impact Performance? A case‐based test of three theories of corporate governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 585-608, July.
    7. Ji Li & Kevin Lam & Gongming Qian & Yongqing Fang, 2006. "The effects of institutional ownership on corporate governance and performance: An empirical assessment in Hong Kong," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 259-276, June.
    8. Shahab Ud Din & Muhammad Arshad Khan & Majid Jamal Khan & Muhammad Yar Khan, 2021. "Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(8), pages 1973-1997, February.
    9. Amneh Alkurdi & Amneh hamad & Hussam Thneibat & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2021. "Ownership structure’s effect on financial performance: An empirical analysis of Jordanian listed firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1939930-193, January.
    10. Amy J. Hillman & Albert A. Cannella & Ramona L. Paetzold, 2000. "The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 235-256, March.
    11. Elyasiani, Elyas & Jia, Jingyi, 2010. "Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 606-620, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nigel Driffield & Jun Du & Jan Godsell & Mark Hart & Katiuscia Lavoratori & Steven Roper & Irina Surdu & Wanrong Zhang, 2021. "Understanding productivity:Organisational Capital perspectives," Working Papers 013, The Productivity Institute.
    2. Sanjana Bhakar & Priti Sharma & Sanjiv Kumar, 2024. "Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Comprehensive Review and Empirical Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 19824-19865, December.
    3. Santanu K. Ganguli & Soumya Guha Deb, 2021. "Board composition, ownership structure and firm performance: New Indian evidence," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 256-268, September.
    4. Afzalur Rashid, 2015. "Revisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 181-198, August.
    5. Akbar, Muhammad & Hussain, Shahzad & Ahmad, Tanveer & Hassan, Shoib, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Pakistan: Dynamic Panel Estimation," CAFE Working Papers 6, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    6. Rimon Emile & Aiman Ragab & Sandy Kyaw, 2014. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance, Evidence from Egypt," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1865-1877, December.
    7. Nebert Mandala & E. Kaijage & J. Aduda & C. Iraya, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Board Structure and Performance of Financial Institutions in Kenya," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-3.
    8. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & García Meca, Emma & Glauben, Thomas, 2021. "Corporate governance and firm performance within the Russian agri-food sector: does ownership structure matter?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 649-668.
    9. Shu-Yu Lin & Che-Chiang Hsu & Chester Wai-Jen Liu, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Taiwan's Food and Catering Industry," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11.
    10. Elsayed, Khaled & Wahba, Hayam, 2013. "Reinvestigating the relationship between ownership structure and inventory management: A corporate governanceperspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 207-218.
    11. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    12. Astami, Emita & Pramono, Agus Joko & Rusmin, Rusmin & Cahaya, Fitra Roman & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2024. "Do family ownership and supervisory board characteristics influence audit report lag? A view from a two-tier board context," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Fernando A. Tejerina-Gaite & Miguel A. Fernández-Temprano, 2021. "The influence of board experience on firm performance: does the director’s role matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 685-705, September.
    14. Ujjayini Roy & Indrani Chakraborty, 2024. "Market concentration, promoter ownership and firm performance: evidence from Indian corporate firms," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 27-85, June.
    15. Chen, Sheng-Syan & Chen, I-Ju, 2012. "Corporate governance and capital allocations of diversified firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 395-409.
    16. Lin, Yongjia Rebecca & Fu, Xiaoqing Maggie, 2017. "Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 17-57.
    17. Nebert Mandala & E. Kaijage & J. Aduda & C. Iraya, 2018. "The Effect of Board Structure and CEO Tenure on Performance of Financial Institutions in Kenya," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4.
    18. Elena Merino & Montserrat Manzaneque & Yolanda Ramírez, 2019. "Value-added distribution to stakeholder of Spanish listed companies: a corporate governance perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 577-604, September.
    19. Ishfaq Gulzar & S. M. Imamul Haque & Tasneem Khan, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Indian Textile Companies: Evidence from NSE 500," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 13(2), pages 210-226, December.
    20. Chenglong Zheng & Roy Kouwenberg, 2019. "A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Corporate Governance and Board Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7940-7965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.