IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p7420-7433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Theoretical Framework of Process Management

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulsalamu Musa

    (PhD Student, Department of Curriculum and Evaluation: Educational Management, Faculty of Education at theƂ University of Yaounde I, Cameroon)

  • Daouda Maingari

    (Head of Department of Curriculum and Evaluation: Educational Management, Faculty of Education at the University of Yaounde I, Cameroon)

Abstract

Higher education institutions face unprecedented challenges from dynamic internal and external factors, including demographic shifts, technological advancements, economic fluctuations, and evolving stakeholder expectations, while traditional fixed institutional structures prove inadequate in addressing these contemporary challenges. This study develops a comprehensive theoretical framework for process management implementation in Cameroon's higher education institutions, proposing a contingency-based theoretical model that balances standardisation with contextual flexibility. The research introduces the Contingency Process Management Theory, grounded in four key assumptions: process management must adapt to institutional context and environmental changes; effective implementation requires accurate data collection and analysis; collaborative stakeholder engagement is essential for successful execution; and institutional processes are interdependent across multiple organisational levels. The study employs a conceptual framework analysis, examining process management types including management processes (document-centric, human-centric, and integration-centric), operational processes, outsourcing designers' processes, supporting processes, and reengineering processes, incorporating systematic strategic execution principles and multi-level process integration approaches. Process management serves as a "strategy execution engine" that transforms strategic goals into operational realities through structured workflows, standardized procedures, and continuous improvement mechanisms, with the framework identifying critical areas for implementation including performance evaluation, resource allocation, traffic management, and core academic functions through four essential steps: conscious process management, process centrality focusing on stakeholders, strategic planning alignment, and comprehensive process architecture design. The proposed framework enables higher education institutions to enhance collaboration, improve communication channels, maintain goal orientation, and achieve sustainable competitive advantage while addressing complexities related to task distribution, control processes, evaluation systems, and quality outcomes, ensuring effectiveness and efficiency in academic operations. The contingency process management framework provides higher education institutions with a dynamic, context-sensitive approach that balances standardisation with flexibility, enabling institutions to effectively navigate contemporary challenges, optimise resource utilisation, and sustain operational excellence while maintaining responsiveness to evolving educational demands and stakeholder expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulsalamu Musa & Daouda Maingari, 2025. "Administrative Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Theoretical Framework of Process Management," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 7420-7433, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7420-7433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/7420-7433.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/administrative-management-in-higher-education-institutions-a-theoretical-framework-of-process-management/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7420-7433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.