IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p7345-7362.html

Understanding the Inclusion Capacity of the Norwegian Friluftsliv Model in Upholding the Quality of Life Through the Ubuntu Perspective – An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Meinrad Haule Lembuka

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University of Tanzania - Dar es Salaam)

Abstract

The study examined the applicability of the Friluftsliv Model in improving quality of life from an Ubuntu perspective. Purposive sampling was utilised to select the Ubuntu theory, which shares similar values of inclusiveness with the Friluftsliv Model in fostering collective community welfare. This theory has demonstrated relevance in understanding how indigenous communities engage in ecological therapeutic practices, with implications that enhance physical and mental health, thereby improving the well-being of vulnerable groups such as individuals with disabilities, elders, pregnant women, orphans, distressed persons, and those with mental health issues. The Model emphasises increased interaction with nature during spring, autumn, winter, and summer through various outdoor activities, as engagement with nature consistently provides a calming and restorative environment conducive to reducing stress, anxiety, and depression. The Model gained greater international recognition during the COVID-19 pandemic, as reports indicated that friluftsliv became especially vital in Europe as a means to prepare for and cope with social restrictions, lockdowns, and other challenges. Norwegian government support for the implementation of the Friluftsliv Model reflects the country's commitment to the World Health Organisation (WHO) Healthy City guidelines, as evidenced by statistics showing that 83% of Norwegians are engaged in nature activities, 77% spend time in nature weekly, and 25% do so most days. Furthermore, 25% stay outdoors overnight, and it has been reported that Norwegians spend more time in nature than indoors. Many nurseries observe that toddlers spend approximately 80% of their time outdoors. A 2020 survey found that 90% of Norwegians reported feeling less stressed and experiencing a better mood when spending time outdoors. In Norway, the right to access nature is both fundamental and universal, positioning the country among the World's top ten happiest nations. This status is attributed to laws and policies, such as the 1957 Outdoor Recreation Act, which enshrined Norwegians’ longstanding right to enjoy nature and thereby supports and promotes the Friluftsliv Model. Although many key Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators emphasise ecological and indigenous methods, referencing the Ubuntu philosophical framework offers new insights into how integrating models like the Friluftsliv Model into national and global agendas can accelerate improvements in overall quality of life. Accordingly, global policymakers should consider revisiting cost-effective indigenous models, such as Friluftsliv, as a means of attaining a collective quality of life that emphasises prevention over costly curative measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Meinrad Haule Lembuka, 2025. "Understanding the Inclusion Capacity of the Norwegian Friluftsliv Model in Upholding the Quality of Life Through the Ubuntu Perspective – An Integrative Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 7345-7362, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7345-7362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/7345-7362.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/understanding-the-inclusion-capacity-of-the-norwegian-friluftsliv-model-in-upholding-the-quality-of-life-through-the-ubuntu-perspective-an-integrative-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van den Berg, Agnes E. & Maas, Jolanda & Verheij, Robert A. & Groenewegen, Peter P., 2010. "Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1203-1210, April.
    2. Kuo, F.E. & Faber Taylor, A., 2004. "A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(9), pages 1580-1586.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Dongying & Newman, Galen & Zhang, Tiantian & Zhu, Rui & Horney, Jennifer, 2021. "Coping with post-hurricane mental distress: The role of neighborhood green space," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Victoria Houlden & João Porto de Albuquerque & Scott Weich & Stephen Jarvis, 2021. "Does nature make us happier? A spatial error model of greenspace types and mental wellbeing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 655-670, May.
    3. Sandifer, Paul A. & Sutton-Grier, Ariana E. & Ward, Bethney P., 2015. "Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 1-15.
    4. He, Qian & Wu, Ling & Lee, Claire Seungeun & Zhu, Chunwu & Bai, Weishan & Guo, Weichen & Ye, Xinyue, 2025. "Greener the safer? Effects of urban green space on community safety and perception of safety using satellite and street view imagery data," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Navarrete-Hernandez, Pablo & Christopher Zegras, P., 2023. "Mind the perception gap: The impact of bus rapid transit infrastructure on travelers’ perceptions of affective subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Jean C. Bikomeye & Joanna Balza & Kirsten M. Beyer, 2021. "The Impact of Schoolyard Greening on Children’s Physical Activity and Socioemotional Health: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Naseem Dillman-Hasso, 2021. "The nature buffer: the missing link in climate change and mental health research," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 696-701, December.
    8. Kay Fretwell & Alison Greig, 2019. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Relationship between Individual’s Self-Reported Connection to Nature, Personal Well-Being and Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Birute Balseviciene & Liuda Sinkariova & Regina Grazuleviciene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Inga Uzdanaviciute & Audrius Dedele & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2014. "Impact of Residential Greenness on Preschool Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Yukun Zhao & Feng Yu & Bo Jing & Xiaomeng Hu & Ang Luo & Kaiping Peng, 2019. "An Analysis of Well-Being Determinants at the City Level in China Using Big Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 973-994, June.
    11. Liu, Wan-Yu & Tsao, Chen & Lin, Chun-Cheng, 2023. "Tourists' preference for colors of forest landscapes and its implications for forest landscape planning policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    12. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of Acceptability and Feasibility of Formal and Informal Planting in Sheffield’s District Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Rojas, Carolina & Páez, Antonio & Barbosa, Olga & Carrasco, Juan, 2016. "Accessibility to urban green spaces in Chilean cities using adaptive thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 227-240.
    14. Bertram, Christine & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2015. "The role of urban green space for human well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 139-152.
    15. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Linda Powers Tomasso & Jie Yin & Jose Guillermo Cedeño Laurent & Jarvis T. Chen & Paul J. Catalano & John D. Spengler, 2021. "The Relationship between Nature Deprivation and Individual Wellbeing across Urban Gradients under COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Jun-Hyun Kim & Chanam Lee & Wonmin Sohn, 2016. "Urban Natural Environments, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hispanic Children Living in Inner-City Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Dutta, Mousumi & Husain, Zakir, 2012. "Use of hospital services and socio-economic status in urban India: Does health insurance ensure equitable outcomes?," MPRA Paper 40055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Annalisa Pacini & Hans Georg Edelmann & Jörg Großschedl & Kirsten Schlüter, 2022. "A Literature Review on Facade Greening: How Research Findings May Be Used to Promote Sustainability and Climate Literacy in School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    20. Yun-Ah Oh & Seon-Ok Kim & Sin-Ae Park, 2019. "Real Foliage Plants as Visual Stimuli to Improve Concentration and Attention in Elementary Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7345-7362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.