IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p6843-6853.html

Strengthening Corporate Fraud Detection through Forensic Accounting and Whistleblowing: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Enforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Syahiza Arsad

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Wan Nailah Abdullah

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Norasmila Awang

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Sahubar Ibrahim Ismail Gani

    (Seksyen Regulatori Penerbitan, Bahagian Penguatkuasaan dan Kawalan, Kementerian Dalam Negeri, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia)

Abstract

Corporate fraud continues to erode stakeholder trust, distort financial markets, and inflict severe economic damage despite advancements in auditing and governance frameworks. While forensic accounting and whistleblowing are critical for proactive fraud detection, their effectiveness hinges on audit committee independence and regulatory enforcement strength. This conceptual paper aims to examine how forensic accounting practices and whistleblowing mechanisms, supported by audit committee independence, enhance corporate fraud detection effectiveness, and how this relationship is moderated by the strength of regulatory enforcement. Using a narrative review of Scopus-indexed literature (2010–2024), this study synthesizes insights on how regulatory enforcement moderates the fraud detection impact of forensic accounting and whistleblowing, enabled by audit committee independence. The study identified key themes and theoretical insights that highlight how forensic techniques, protected reporting channels, and independent oversight function as complementary fraud detection mechanisms whose efficacy is amplified under strong regulatory regimes. The findings suggest that while forensic accounting and whistleblowing are potent on their own, their impact on fraud detection is significantly strengthened when audit committees are independent and when regulatory bodies actively monitor, investigate, and penalize misconduct. The study contributes theoretically by integrating agency theory, institutional theory, and the fraud triangle to develop a framework explaining the conditional effectiveness of internal controls. Practically, it offers actionable insights for regulators, corporate boards, and compliance officers to design synergistic fraud detection systems aligned with external enforcement realities. Limitations include reliance on conceptual synthesis without empirical testing, prompting the need for future cross-national and longitudinal studies to validate the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Syahiza Arsad & Wan Nailah Abdullah & Norasmila Awang & Sahubar Ibrahim Ismail Gani, 2025. "Strengthening Corporate Fraud Detection through Forensic Accounting and Whistleblowing: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Enforcement," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 6843-6853, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:6843-6853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/6843-6853.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/strengthening-corporate-fraud-detection-through-forensic-accounting-and-whistleblowing-the-moderating-role-of-regulatory-enforcement/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2006. "What Works in Securities Laws?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 1-32, February.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. Junjie Wang & Yan Chen & Sanfa Wang, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG performance and corporate violation: Based on the fraud triangle theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5606-5626, November.
    4. Francesca Calamunci & Francesco Drago, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Organized Crime Infiltration in the Legal Economy: Evidence from the Judicial Administration of Organized Crime Firms," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 6(2), pages 275-297, July.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    6. Drago, Francesco & Calamunci, Francesca, 2020. "The economic impact of organized crime infiltration in the legal economy: evidence from the judicial administration of organize," CEPR Discussion Papers 14326, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Paolo Polidori & Désirée Teobaldelli, 2018. "Corporate criminal liability and optimal firm behavior: internal monitoring versus managerial incentives," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 251-284, April.
    8. Pistor, Katharina, 2013. "A legal theory of finance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 315-330.
    9. Haifeng Hu & Bin Dou & Aiping Wang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Corporate Fraud—“Risk Reduction” Effect or “Window Dressing” Effect?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Alexander Dyck & Adair Morse & Luigi Zingales, 2010. "Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(6), pages 2213-2253, December.
    11. Andrew C. Call & Gerald S. Martin & Nathan Y. Sharp & Jaron H. Wilde, 2018. "Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(1), pages 123-171, March.
    12. Del Bosco, Barbara & Misani, Nicola, 2011. "Keeping the enemies close: The contribution of corporate social responsibility to reducing crime against the firm," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 87-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan Nailah Abdullah & Syahiza Arsad & Hasnisah Hassan & Rahayati Ahmad & Muhammad Arif, 2025. "Criminal Conduct in Corporations: Can Strong Governance Prevent the Fallout on Firm Performance?," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 1892-1901, August.
    2. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Gao, Xin & Xu, Weidong & Li, Donghui, 2022. "Media coverage and corporate risk-taking: International evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Pensiero, Domenico & Velayutham, Eswaran, 2021. "Corruption risk and stock market effects: Evidence from the defence industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Gao, Xin & Xu, Weidong & Li, Donghui, 2025. "Media coverage and managerial investment learning from stock markets: International evidence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Constant Djama, 2008. "Fraude A L'Information Comptable Et Financiere : Le Role Des Autorites De Regulation," Post-Print halshs-00522510, HAL.
    7. Adongo, Jonathan O., 2017. "Legal jurisdiction, director liability law, and venture capitalists’ equity stakes in Africa," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 78-93.
    8. Guttentag Michael, 2007. "Accuracy Enhancement, Agency Costs, and Disclosure Regulation," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 611-641, December.
    9. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Ghouma, Hatem, 2018. "Employee welfare and stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 700-725.
    10. Djankov, Simeon & La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei, 2008. "The law and economics of self-dealing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 430-465, June.
    11. Hu, Gang & Liu, Yiye & Wang, Jacqueline Wenjie & Zhou, Gaoguang & Zhu, Xindong, 2022. "Insider ownership and stock price crash risk around the globe," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Yi Si & Chongwu Xia, 2023. "The Effect of Human Capital on Stock Price Crash Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(3), pages 589-609, October.
    13. Bellavite Pellegrini, Carlo & Pellegrini, Laura & Sironi, Emiliano, 2010. "Alternative vs Traditional Corporate Governance Systems in Italy: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 104656, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2010.
    14. Andrei Shleifer & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Rafael La Porta, 2008. "The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 285-332, June.
    15. Dan Amiram & Zahn Bozanic & James D. Cox & Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff & Richard Sloan, 2018. "Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 732-783, June.
    16. Jian Zhang, 2018. "Public Governance and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Recent Anti-corruption Campaign in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 375-396, March.
    17. Wenxiu Hu & Jinzhu Du & Weiguo Zhang, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Innovation Sustainability: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Cumming, Douglas & Knill, April & Richardson, Nela, 2015. "Firm size and the impact of securities regulation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 417-442.
    19. Teresa Chu & In-Mu Haw & Bryan Lee & Woody Wu, 2014. "Cost of equity capital, control divergence, and institutions: the international evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 483-527, October.
    20. Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2013. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 1-33.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:6843-6853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.