IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p4260-4271.html

A Review on Acceptance of Chatbots for Learning: Malaysian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Farhana Idris

    (Academy of Language Studies, MARA University of Technology, Segamat Campus, Johore, Malaysia)

  • Fadhilah Idris

    (Centre for Foundation and General Studies, Manipal University College, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Ainul Adiba Saleh

    (Academy of Language Studies, MARA University of Technology, Segamat Campus, Johore, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Izuan Ismail

    (Academy of Language Studies, MARA University of Technology, Segamat Campus, Johore, Malaysia)

Abstract

This review explores the acceptance of chatbots- an increasingly prominent application of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning processes at higher education levels in Malaysia. Chatbots, powered by AI, have become integral tools and are widely used across various fields, including healthcare, finance, retail, and customer service, but are least known in the education sector. Their adoption in education remains limited, primarily confined to basic administrative tasks only. Despite their potential to revolutionize education, chatbots' implementation is still largely experimental and not explicitly addressed in pedagogy and learning, for it is still in its infancy. This study synthesizes findings from selected articles to explore students' acceptance levels of chatbots, both theoretical and practical, across different educational fields. The analysis identifies key themes influencing chatbot adoption, including perceived usefulness/performance expectancy, perceived ease of use/effort expectancy, adoption intention/behavioural intention, scaffolding/learning support, social influence, habit formation/engagement, trust and ethics, and design and interactivity. Findings reveal that perceived usefulness and ease of use are significant predictors of students' acceptance, while factors such as social influence, trust, and ethics play supporting roles. By offering personalized responses, enhancing students’ engagement, and cultivating academic success, chatbots are acknowledged for their capacity to improve students’ learning experiences. However, trust, ethics, and design-related issues remain underexplored. Clear guidelines and policies on appropriate chatbot usage must be established by educational institutions to ensure academic integrity while leveraging this technology to support effective learning. This review concludes that a complex interaction of technical, social, and ethical factors influenced the chatbot's acceptance in Malaysia. Academicians and higher education institutions can maximize chatbots’ capacity and potential to revolutionize learning within the Malaysian higher education sector by taking these factors into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Farhana Idris & Fadhilah Idris & Ainul Adiba Saleh & Mohd Izuan Ismail, 2025. "A Review on Acceptance of Chatbots for Learning: Malaysian Context," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 4260-4271, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:4260-4271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/4260-4271.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/a-review-on-acceptance-of-chatbots-for-learning-malaysian-context/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    2. Noor Irliana Mohd Rahim & Noorminshah A. Iahad & Ahmad Fadhil Yusof & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi, 2022. "AI-Based Chatbots Adoption Model for Higher-Education Institutions: A Hybrid PLS-SEM-Neural Network Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amr S. Abdallah & Hala Amin & Mohammed Abdelghany & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2025. "Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: a systematic review, integrated framework, and agenda for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3067-3118, December.
    2. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Dev, Dhairya, 2025. "Crude oil Price forecasting: Leveraging machine learning for global economic stability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Eusebius Pantja Pramudya & Lukas Rumboko Wibowo & Fitri Nurfatriani & Iman Kasiman Nawireja & Dewi Ratna Kurniasari & Sakti Hutabarat & Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman & Ananda Oemi Iswardhani & Rukaiyah , 2022. "Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    8. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    9. Ruchi Arora & Meera Kapoor & Nidhi Singh & Muhammad Zafar Yaqub, 2025. "Green cryptocurrency and business strategies: Framework and insights from a stewardship literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 804-829, January.
    10. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2020. "Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Hanna Lehtimäki & Kristina Leppälä & Nuppu Mielonen & Ville‐Veikko Piispanen & Kaisa Henttonen & Subhanjan Sengupta & Ida Parkkinen & Olena Liakh, 2026. "Sustainable Innovation Framework: A Review of Organization, Strategic Management, and Entrepreneurship Literature," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 34-64, January.
    13. Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Raul Oltra-Badenes & Pedro Soto-Acosta, 2024. "Customer relationship management and its impact on entrepreneurial marketing: a literature review," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 507-547, June.
    14. Aleksandra Kuzior & Mariya Sira, 2025. "Sustainable Digital Economy Transformation Through Intelligent Automation: A Multi-Environmental Framework for Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    17. Sevasti Lamprou & Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & George Kalliris, 2025. "The Critical Impact and Socio-Ethical Implications of AI on Content Generation Practices in Media Organizations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Tim Rademaker & Ingo Klingenberg & Stefan Süß, 2025. "Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 429-494, February.
    19. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:4260-4271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.