Author
Listed:
- Akhmal Khalis Mohd Isa
(¹Politeknik Sultan Idris Shah, Selangor, Malaysia)
- Mashanum Osman
(Center for Advanced Computing Technology (C-ACT), Faculty of Information and Communication Technology (FTMK), University Technical Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia)
- Zuraini Othman
(Center for Advanced Computing Technology (C-ACT), Faculty of Information and Communication Technology (FTMK), University Technical Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of digital learning tools for online assessment in higher education institutions. This study evaluates the usability of digital learning tools used for online assessment submission in Malaysian technical education institutions. Using the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) questionnaire, data were collected from 80 students and 21 lecturers from community colleges (kolej community) and polytechnics in Johor, Malaysia. The findings reveal that Google Classroom is the most frequently used digital learning tool (79% usage rate), followed by Microsoft Teams (9.9%). While lecturers expressed high satisfaction with digital learning tools (mean score 4.43-4.71), students showed lower satisfaction levels (mean score 2.63-2.69), particularly regarding ease of use and immediate feedback mechanisms. The study identifies a significant gap between educator and student perceptions of digital learning tools, highlighting the need for improved user interface design and enhanced feedback systems for formative assessment. These findings contribute to the understanding of usability factors in educational technology and provide insights for improving online assessment tools in technical education contexts.
Suggested Citation
Akhmal Khalis Mohd Isa & Mashanum Osman & Zuraini Othman, 2025.
"Usability Evaluation of Digital Learning Tools for Online Assessment: A Study of Malaysian Technical Education Institutions,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 2082-2090, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:2082-2090
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:2082-2090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.