IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-8p6104-6117.html

Preference for Video Conferencing Features in Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Hidayah Rahmalan

    (Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat & Komunikasi, Univerisiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka)

  • Siti Nurul Mahfuzah

    (Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat & Komunikasi, Univerisiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka)

  • Norashikin Ahmad

    (Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat & Komunikasi, Univerisiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka)

  • Mohd Faiz Ibrahim Sawal

    (SME Bank Malaysia)

  • Christy Atika Sari

    (Dian Nuswantoro University, Indonesia)

Abstract

Student engagement is crucial for quality online learning, yet studies indicate that many students choose to turn off their cameras during synchronous sessions, raising questions about how they continue their learning. This study investigates undergraduate students' preferences for specific video conferencing features in synchronous online learning. Adopting a cross-sectional, quantitative survey design, data was collected from 54 Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) undergraduates via a structured questionnaire. Findings reveal that the majority of respondents (75.9%) have engaged in synchronous online learning for 2 to 5 years. Microsoft Teams emerged as the most preferred online learning platform (61%), primarily valued for its lack of meeting time limits, built-in cloud recording, and all-in-one workspace integration. Google Meet was the second most favored (28%) due to familiarity and a straightforward interface. Recording (90.7% used, 51% preferred) and Screen Sharing (85.2% used, 24% preferred) were identified as the most frequently used and preferred video conferencing features, cited for enabling content review, note-taking, and clear visual explanations. Notably, there was an overwhelming preference among students to keep their cameras off (96.3%). Primary reasons for this included concerns about other people being seen behind them (61.1%), personal appearance (50%), and weak internet connections (48.1%). These results highlight that students prioritize features supporting content accessibility, instructional clarity, and communication efficiency. The study underscores the complex interplay of privacy, anxiety, and technical barriers in students' engagement, suggesting that educators should consider camera-optional environments and leverage non-video engagement tools to foster inclusive online learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Hidayah Rahmalan & Siti Nurul Mahfuzah & Norashikin Ahmad & Mohd Faiz Ibrahim Sawal & Christy Atika Sari, 2025. "Preference for Video Conferencing Features in Online Learning," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(8), pages 6104-6117, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:6104-6117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-8/6104-6117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/preference-for-video-conferencing-features-in-online-learning/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olusiji Adebola Lasekan & Vengalarao Pachava & Margot Teresa Godoy Pena & Siva Krishna Golla & Mariya Samreen Raje, 2024. "Investigating Factors Influencing Students’ Engagement in Sustainable Online Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norhayati Sulaiman & Sunarti Halid & Norliana Omar & Noor Saatila Mohd Isa & Rahayu Abd Rahman, 2026. "Understanding Students’ Engagement with Video-Based Lectures: The Role of TAM and Prior Exposure," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(5), pages 10821-10829, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:6104-6117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.