Author
Abstract
This article examines India’s forthcoming 2026 delimitation exercise, which represents a critical juncture for the nation’s federal structure and democratic integrity. The analysis explores the constitutional framework governing the Delimitation Commission and investigates how divergent demographic patterns between northern and southern states have created an unprecedented challenge for equitable representation. Population projections indicate a significant power shift, with northern states potentially gaining 43 parliamentary seats while southern states lose 24, fundamentally altering federal power dynamics. Southern states, having successfully implemented population stabilization policies, face reduced representation despite their developmental achievements and disproportionate economic contributions. Meanwhile, northern states assert their constitutional right to representation based on current population figures, citing greater infrastructure needs and resource requirements. The article evaluates competing perspectives and proposes innovative solutions including hybrid allocation formulas, constitutional safeguards, and international models like Germany’s weighted voting system and the European Parliament’s digressive proportionality. The research concludes that India must pioneer representation mechanisms that balance population realities with federal stability through constitutional creativity—models that acknowledge population size while not penalizing successful implementation of national policies. This delimitation exercise ultimately presents an opportunity to strengthen India’s democratic foundation by developing representation formulas that honor both demographic realities and federal diversity within the world’s largest democracy.
Suggested Citation
Paladugula Dhanraj, 2025.
"“North-South Divide: Constitutional Challenges and Federal Implications of India’s 2026 Delimitation Exerciseâ€,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(8), pages 403-410, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:403-410
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:403-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.