IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-7p6312-6349.html

Decolonizing Digital Resilience: An Intersectional Framework for Transformative Gender-Responsive Social Protection in Zimbabwe’s Migration-Development Nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Musitaffa Mweha

    (Independent Researcher, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP))

Abstract

This research develops a transformative intersectional framework for gender-responsive social protection policy that enhances sustainable reintegration of Zimbabwean return migrants while addressing systemic inequalities and digital divides. The study employs a decolonial policy analysis framework combined with digital intersectionality lens to examine Zimbabwe’s social protection architecture. Using a comprehensive desk review methodology, the research analyses 78 policy documents, international frameworks, and peer-reviewed publications from 2020-2025. The findings reveal significant colonial legacies embedded in Zimbabwe’s social protection system that perpetuate gender inequalities and exclude returnee migrants. Digital transformation initiatives lack gender-responsive design, creating additional barriers for marginalized populations. The research identifies five critical intersections where gender, migration status, age, disability, and rurality compound vulnerabilities. Key results demonstrate that 67% of female returnees face multiple barriers accessing social protection services, while digital initiatives have increased exclusion rates by 23% among elderly and disabled migrants. The proposed Transformative Intersectional Social Protection Framework (TISPF) integrates decolonial principles with digital inclusion strategies, offering a comprehensive approach to policy transformation. The framework introduces innovative performance indicators measuring transformative impact beyond traditional metrics, including empowerment indices and structural change assessments. Policy recommendations emphasize participatory design processes, algorithmic bias mitigation, and community-based implementation strategies. The research contributes to emerging scholarship on decolonial social protection theory while providing practical tools for policymakers. This pioneering study advances understanding of migration-development-protection nexus through intersectional vulnerability mapping and AI-informed policy design. The framework’s applicability extends to other post-colonial contexts, offering global relevance for transformative social protection initiatives. The research establishes new theoretical foundations for gender-responsive migration governance while addressing urgent practical needs in Zimbabwe’s evolving migration landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Musitaffa Mweha, 2025. "Decolonizing Digital Resilience: An Intersectional Framework for Transformative Gender-Responsive Social Protection in Zimbabwe’s Migration-Development Nexus," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 6312-6349, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:6312-6349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-7/6312-6349.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/decolonizing-digital-resilience-an-intersectional-framework-for-transformative-gender-responsive-social-protection-in-zimbabwes-migration-development-nexus/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuba Bircan & Emre Eren Korkmaz, 2021. "Big data for whose sake? Governing migration through artificial intelligence," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Afrah Al-Ahmadi & Alessandra Heinemann & Lindsay Mossman & Laura Rawlings, 2024. "Accelerating Gender Equality Through Social Protection," World Bank Publications - Reports 42271, The World Bank Group.
    3. Lowe,Christina Louise & Rigolini,Iamele P. & Solbes Castro,Lucia & Bastagli,Francesca Adele, 2023. "Pathways toward digitalization in Social Protection and Labor (SPL) service delivery," The Social Policy and Labor Discussion Paper Series 185112, The World Bank.
    4. Christina Lowe & Jamele Rigolini & Lucia Solbes Castro & Francesca Bastagli, 2023. "Pathways toward digitalization in Social Protection and Labor (SPL) service delivery," World Bank Publications - Reports 40473, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Jinping Lin & Kangmin Wu, 2023. "Intercity asymmetrical linkages influenced by Spring Festival migration and its multivariate distance determinants: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta Region in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ingrid Campo-Ruiz, 2025. "Artificial intelligence may affect diversity: architecture and cultural context reflected through ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Google Maps," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Andrea Guillén & Emma Teodoro, 2023. "Embedding Ethical Principles into AI Predictive Tools for Migration Management in Humanitarian Action," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Anas Ansar & Abu Faisal Md. Khaled, 2023. "In search of a Rohingya digital diaspora: virtual togetherness, collective identities and political mobilisation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Jurić, Tado, 2022. "Predicting refugee flows from Ukraine with an approach to Big (Crisis) Data: a new opportunity for refugee and humanitarian studies," EconStor Preprints 251215, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:6312-6349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.