Electoral Technology in the Democratization Process: A Comparative Analysis of Kenya and Estonia

This paper examines how electoral technology influences democratic outcomes in Kenya and Estonia, revealing divergent trajectories in digitizing electoral systems and their implications for democratization. Estonia stands out as a global exemplar in the integration of digital technologies within governance, particularly through its entrenched system of internet voting. Despite facing multiple security challenges over the years, Estonia has cultivated strong public trust in its e-democracy infrastructure, with internet voting normalized and broadly embraced by citizens. This success is attributable to robust institutional safeguards, a transparent regulatory environment, and sustained civic engagement. In contrast, Kenya’s experience underscores the complexities and risks associated with deploying electoral technologies in contexts where institutional safeguards are weaker. Despite efforts by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to enhance efficiency and reduce human error through biometric systems and electronic transmission of results, implementation has often been marred by controversy. Key concerns include third-party control over critical infrastructure, lack of comprehensive system audits, and widespread public skepticism regarding reliability and transparency. These factors have raised legitimate fears of potential manipulation and electoral misconduct, eroding civic trust and impeding democratic consolidation.