Mainstreaming Climate Justice in Environmental Impact Assessments: A Case for Vulnerable Communities in West Africa

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are critical tools in safeguarding ecological systems, but their traditional focus on biophysical metrics often overlooks the disproportionate impacts of environmental projects on marginalized and climate-vulnerable communities. In West Africa, where socio-economic inequalities and environmental degradation intersect, the need to integrate climate justice into EIA processes has become urgent. This article explores how EIAs can be restructured to reflect the principles of climate justice; namely equity, participation, and accountability by foregrounding the lived experiences and rights of indigenous peoples, women, and poor rural populations. Drawing on international human rights frameworks, regional environmental policies, and case studies from Ghana and Nigeria this study critically evaluates existing EIA practices and proposes practical reforms. These include participatory assessment models, community-led baseline studies, and justice-sensitive indicators. This study revealed fundamental weaknesses in how Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are designed and implemented in West Africa, particularly in their failure to meaningfully integrate the perspectives and vulnerabilities of marginalized populations. Four interrelated dimensions; participation, climate responsiveness, legal recognition, and equitable mitigation reveal persistent structural inequities that hinder the realization of climate justice in environmental governance. Ultimately, the paper argues that mainstreaming climate justice in EIAs is not merely a procedural enhancement but a transformative approach that strengthens environmental governance, fosters social inclusion, and enhances resilience in the face of climate change. The paper further makes policy recommendations.