Are Political Principles Dependent on Objective Moral Philosophy?

This paper explores the relationship between political principles and objective moral philosophy, examining the extent to which political frameworks derive their legitimacy from established moral norms. The positive motion argues that political principles are fundamentally dependent on objective moral philosophy, drawing on Ayn Rand’s Objectivist Ethics, which emphasises reason, individual rights, and the objective reality of human existence. This perspective asserts that moral principles grounded in human nature provide a foundation for justice, individual rights, and fair governance. In contrast, the negative motion contends that political principles can exist independently of a specific moral framework, shaped instead by practical considerations, moral pluralism, and the need for adaptability in diverse societies. By analysing case studies, including democratic systems that protect individual freedoms and utilitarian-driven policies, the paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of both perspectives. Ultimately, the paper highlights the implications for governance in modern societies, suggesting that while objective moral philosophy offers a strong foundation for political principles, the dynamic nature of contemporary governance necessitates flexibility and pragmatism to address the complexities of diverse, pluralistic communities.