Author
Listed:
- Daradi Gogoi
(Mahapurusha Srimanta Sankaradeva Viswavidyalaya, Nagaon (Assam))
- Dr. Karabi Konch
(Mahapurusha Srimanta Sankaradeva Viswavidyalaya, Nagaon (Assam))
Abstract
This article intends to explore the appearance of everyday lived experiences of tea garden women, with a particular focus on the intersection of their roles within the private and public spheres. Women are displayed as an icon of tea plantation and the most potential work force in the industry. Despite being important participations, women are victims and worst sufferers in their work in both public as well as private speeches of life. The tea garden labourers in Assam branded as the tea tribes, usually known as Adivasi live a ghettoized life in tea garden. Women in tea plantations are the most vulnerable ones who are exploited to both close as well as open structure of patriarchal discourse. The research article attempts to understanding the factors associated of women violence and examine the in depth phenomenological inquiry of lived realities of Adivasi women labourers from the meniscus of Raewyn Connell theory of Hegemonic Masculinity. Violent metaphors are often undesirable participations therefore such experience tends to stay of mind forever. A person who experiences and victims of traumatic events in remembering such experiences all the time to defeating their disgrace, shame and self regard. This article focuses on the narratives of women labourers in tea plantation for steeping in challenges to manipulate with everyday life. The purpose of the conclusion is trying to propose women are targeted the circumstances of violence and victims of gender discrimination and gender relation through the lived realities in tea plantations.
Suggested Citation
Daradi Gogoi & Dr. Karabi Konch, 2025.
"Voices from the Fields: A Phenomenological Exploration of Adivasi Women’s Live Experiences in Tea plantation Assam, India,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 5959-5970, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:5959-5970
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:5959-5970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.