Author
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of education, the 21st-century curriculum emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication, and digital literacy. This paper explores the significance of Basic design as an indispensable component in implementing the 21st-century curriculum in basic schools in Ghana. Basic design fosters spatial reasoning, visual communication, and problem-solving skills, which are essential in preparing learners for future careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Despite its relevance, Basic Design is often underemphasized at the basic level of education. This study advocates for its integration into the curriculum as a foundational subject that bridges theoretical concepts with practical application. The research design employed was qualitative, utilizing discourse analysis as the primary methodological framework. This approach allows for an in-depth examination of Basic Design as an indispensable component in implementing the 21st-century curriculum in basic schools in Ghana. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to ensure representation and diversity within the selected participants. In all twenty (20) participants took part in the study. Aligning Basic Design with the competencies outlined in Ghana’s Standards-Based Curriculum, the study highlights how it can enhance learners’ creativity, precision, and design thinking skills. The paper concludes by recommending strategies for curriculum developers, policymakers, and educators to reposition Basic Design as a core subject that empowers students with 21st-century skills essential for national development and global competitiveness. Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) propounded by David A. Kolb in 1984 underpinned the investigation.
Suggested Citation
Frank Opoku, 2025.
"Examining Efficacy of Basic Design in the Implementation of 21st Century Curriculum in Basic Schools,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 5952-5958, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:5952-5958
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:5952-5958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.