IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-5p6454-6459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems with the Annulment of Arbitral Awards in the Perspective of the Principle of Access to Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Sherly Ayuna Putri

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang, Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Amelia Cahyadini

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang, Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Yulinda Adharani

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang, Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Yoan Shevila Kristiyenda

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang, Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia)

Abstract

The annulment of arbitration awards in Indonesia has led to various issues affecting the effectiveness of the arbitration system, legal certainty, and the principle of access to justice for disputing parties. Although arbitration is intended to be a final and binding dispute resolution mechanism, inconsistent annulment practices by courts often undermine trust in the system. This study examines issues related to the annulment of arbitration awards, particularly how such annulments impact the principle of access to justice. Regulatory reforms are necessary to clarify the provisions governing grounds for annulment and to ensure that the principle of access to justice is maintained in arbitration.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherly Ayuna Putri & Amelia Cahyadini & Yulinda Adharani & Yoan Shevila Kristiyenda, 2025. "Problems with the Annulment of Arbitral Awards in the Perspective of the Principle of Access to Justice," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 6454-6459, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:6454-6459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-5/6454-6459.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/problems-with-the-annulment-of-arbitral-awards-in-the-perspective-of-the-principle-of-access-to-justice/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:6454-6459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.