IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-5p6230-6242.html

BIM in Chinese High-Rise Building Projects: Challenges to Adoption and Strategic Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Riazi Mehdi Riazi

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, University Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang)

  • Hao Zelong

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, University Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang)

  • Meng Zichen

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, University Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang)

  • Liu Qianwen

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, University Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang)

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a key innovation for dealing with many issues troubling the construction industry, especially in dealing with complex projects, like high-rise building projects. Despite the well-documented benefits of BIM, such as increased efficiency, greater accuracy, better collaboration, and reduced errors in workflows, its adoption in China is still limited. This gap in adoption, given the context of rapid urbanization and increased demand in housing, presents a clear challenge in meeting industry expectations and other stakeholder requirements. Even though the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development acknowledges the advantages of BIM and actively encourages its integration into construction processes, there are still numerous barriers to its adoption. This research focuses on identifying the barriers that hinder the application of BIM and offers solutions to overcome these challenges, emphasizing on high-rise building projects in China. 200 close-ended questionnaires were distributed and 132 usable responses were received, resulting in a 66 percent response rate. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Respondents were balanced in terms of gender and most of them pose commendable education level and industry experience. Most of them also are directly linked to site-based operations hence, experienced insights were offered. As outlined in the analysis, major barriers that were noted include the need for advanced technical expertise, high implementation costs, and a limited understanding of BIM’s long-term ROI. Combined, these obstacles have created an insufficient pool of skilled BIM professionals and delayed industry-wide adoption. To resolve these concerns, ways forward include improving stakeholder communication to promote streamlined workflows, government policy action, strategic incentive design, targeted training program accessibility, and reduced financial barriers to adoption. Altogether, these approaches alleviate barriers associated with the integration of BIM technology in high-rise building construction in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Riazi Mehdi Riazi & Hao Zelong & Meng Zichen & Liu Qianwen, 2025. "BIM in Chinese High-Rise Building Projects: Challenges to Adoption and Strategic Recommendations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 6230-6242, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:6230-6242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-5/6230-6242.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/bim-in-chinese-high-rise-building-projects-challenges-to-adoption-and-strategic-recommendations/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Pill, Juri, 1971. "The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 57-71, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hardaker, J. B., 1982. "Fundamental Aspects Of Risk And Uncertainty In Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    2. Zahra Karbasi & Maliheh Kadivar & Reza Safdari & Leila Shahmoradi & Maryam Zahmatkeshan & Somayyeh Zakerabasali & Shahabeddin Abhari & Azadeh Sayarifard, 2020. "Better monitoring of abused children by designing a child abuse surveillance system: Determining national child abuse minimum data set," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 843-851, July.
    3. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    4. Sonal Singh & Julie Beyrer & Xiaofeng Zhou & Joel Swerdel & Raymond A. Harvey & Kenneth Hornbuckle & Leo Russo & Kanwal Ghauri & Ivan H. Abi-Elias & John S. Cox & Carla Rodriguez-Watson, 2023. "Development and Evaluation of the Algorithm CErtaInty Tool (ACE-IT) to Assess Electronic Medical Record and Claims-based Algorithms’ Fit for Purpose for Safety Outcomes," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 87-97, January.
    5. Sara Biscaya & Hisham Elkadi, 2023. "A Catalyst Approach for Smart Ecological Urban Corridors at Disused Waterways," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 406-424.
    6. Saud Alshehri & Yacine Rezgui & Haijiang Li, 2015. "Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2221-2245, February.
    7. Siti Raudhah M. Yusop & Mohamad Sattar Rasul & Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin & Haida Umiera Hashim, 2023. "Identifying and Validating Vocational Skills Domains and Indicators in Classroom Assessment Practices in TVET," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    8. McCarl, Bruce A. & Musser, Wesley N., 1985. "Modeling Long Run Risk In Production And Investment Decisions," Regional Research Projects > 1985: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 24-27, 1985, Charleston, South Carolina 271799, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    9. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Sara Biscaya & Hisham Elkadi, 2023. "A Catalyst Approach for Smart Ecological Urban Corridors at Disused Waterways," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 406-424.
    12. J. P. Sharma & Sunaina Kanojia & Shikha Sachdeva, 2018. "Comparison of Whistle-blower Protection Mechanism of Select Countries," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(1), pages 45-68, June.
    13. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    14. Unknown, 1998. "References/Literature Cited," Commodity Costs and Returns Estimation Handbook,, Iowa State University.
    15. Sahar Mirzaee & David Fannon & Matthias Ruth, 2019. "A comparison of preference elicitation methods for multi-criteria design decisions about resilient and sustainable buildings," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 439-453, December.
    16. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2024. "A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 2: Refining the Conceptual Framework Using the Delphi Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    17. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:638-662 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Aguado Molina, Roque & Cartelle Barros, Juan José & de la Cruz López, María del Pilar & Lara Coira, Manuel & del Caño Gochi, Alfredo, 2025. "A comparative sustainability assessment of several grid energy storage technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 396(C).
    19. Hyun Baek & Sun-Kyoung Park, 2015. "Sustainable Development Plan for Korea through Expansion of Green IT: Policy Issues for the Effective Utilization of Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Shiri Alon & Gabrielle Gayer, 2025. "A Procedure for Revising Data-Based Priors in a Group," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1737-1755, February.
    21. Shaowen Wang & Xiaojun Liu & Weixing Shao, 2023. "Drivers of Engineering Procurement and Construction Model Adoption Behavior by Public Construction Owners in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:6230-6242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.