IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-4p2984-3006.html

Cooperative Learning Can Promote Active Engagement and Critical Thinking: An Undergraduate Zoology Case Study at a Government College of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Ariful Anwar Khan

    (Department of Zoology, Government Hazi Muhammad Mohsin College)

Abstract

Introduction. Cooperative learning can enhance students’ motivation, active engagement, deep understanding, and critical thinking by stimulating their inquisitiveness and analytical capacities in learning process. This requires systematically operated explorative and complex problem-solving activities that apparently remain under explored in Bangladesh college education perspective. Methodology. A single qualitative method case study in one government college of Bangladesh was aimed to investigate the perceptions of undergraduate zoology students and teachers about the effect of cooperative learning on learners’ active engagement and critical thinking. Questionnaires containing a mixture of Likert scales and open-ended questions were used to investigate 3rd and 4th year undergraduate zoology students’ (n=36) perspectives, while semi-structured interviews were conducted simultaneously to understand teachers’ (n=8) experience and opinions of using cooperative learning pedagogies and their effects. All but three respondent students were female so that gender issue was not considered in data analysis. The study data- both qualitative and quantitative were analyzed statistically on MS-Excel-2016. Findings. The study revealed a clear positive consensus of the respondent students and teachers on the ability of small group work based cooperative learning to promote students’ active engagement and critical thinking. Both responding groups perceived students’ active engagement, better critical thinking and peer sharing, and alternative ways of solution as the benefits, whilst ensuring adequate learning resources, active peer engagement, and equal access to learning resources as the challenges of the learning tool. Most students (83%) viewed the new learning settings to help them engage equally and 86% assessed their performance to be promoted to very good or excellent ranks. Moreover, 83% either agreed or strongly agreed that their participation in cooperative learning classes could enhance their critical thinking ability whilst, teachers’ instructional design for students’ equal access to adequate learning resources and motivation for new and alternative ways of learning appeared the mostly viewed pedagogical elements for promoting students’ active engagement and critical thinking respectively. There was a clear agreement between the perceptions of the students and their teachers in many instances of the positive roles of the learning method for better student outcomes. Conclusion. Cooperative pedagogies not only promote students’ active engagement but their critical thinking abilities also. Forming small- groups of students to the beginning of a marking session and assigning them with research projects as part of their course works seemingly helped bring better learning achievement in the study. This has strengthened the call for adopting cooperative learning as a regular alternative instructional method in under graduate zoology classes of Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Ariful Anwar Khan, 2025. "Cooperative Learning Can Promote Active Engagement and Critical Thinking: An Undergraduate Zoology Case Study at a Government College of Bangladesh," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 2984-3006, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2984-3006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/2984-3006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/cooperative-learning-can-promote-active-engagement-and-critical-thinking-an-undergraduate-zoology-case-study-at-a-government-college-of-bangladesh/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Marie Fritschner, 2000. "Inside the Undergraduate College Classroom," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 342-362, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Riley Bahr & Claire A. Boeck & Phyllis A. Cummins, 2022. "Is Age Just a Number? A Statewide Investigation of Community College Students’ Age, Classroom Context, and Course Outcomes in College Math and English," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(4), pages 631-671, June.
    2. Wen-Jye Shyr & Wei-Sho Ho & Jie-Ru Chen & Li-Ya Chang & I-Min Chen, 2022. "Effectiveness of Social Participation Courses Applied in the Disaster Prevention for Taiwanese K-12 Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Daniel Goller & Andrea Diem & Stefan C. Wolter, 2022. "Sitting next to a dropout: Study success of students with peers that came to the lecture hall by a different route," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0190, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    4. Le Xuan Mai & Le Khanh Ngoc & Le Thanh Thao, 2024. "Factors Hindering Student Participation in English-Speaking Classes: Student and Lecturer Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    5. Javier Márquez & Laura Lazcano & Carmen Bada & José Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete, 2023. "Class participation and feedback as enablers of student academic performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    6. Derara Duba Rufo, 2024. "Empirical Action Research on Improving Student’s Classroom Participation: The Case of Dilla University Computer Engineering Students," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 127-138, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2984-3006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.